2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2021.3131489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Similarity Features for Multimodal Remote Sensing Image Matching

Abstract: Multimodal remote sensing image matching is a challenging task because of the existence of significant radiometric differences. To address the problem, we develop a novel multimodal remote sensing image matching method based on selfsimilarity features. The offset mean filtering method is proposed first to calculate the self-similarity features fast based on the symmetry of the self-similarity. The self-similarity features are presented through a multi-channel self-similarity map (SSM) and a corresponding multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we evaluate the proposed algorithm on three multimodal remote sensing datasets and compare its performance against three state-of-the-art algorithms, namely RIFT [6], SRIF [11], and OSS [15]. For fairness, our algorithm increases the number of extracted feature points M to 2% of the total pixel number to achieve comparability with RIFT and SRIF in terms of the feature point number.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we evaluate the proposed algorithm on three multimodal remote sensing datasets and compare its performance against three state-of-the-art algorithms, namely RIFT [6], SRIF [11], and OSS [15]. For fairness, our algorithm increases the number of extracted feature points M to 2% of the total pixel number to achieve comparability with RIFT and SRIF in terms of the feature point number.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the high computational overhead, our previous work designed an offset mean filtering (OMF) method to efficiently compute the SS feature. Additionally, we designed an improved maximal selfdissimilarities (IMSD) feature detector and an oriented selfsimilarity (OSS) feature descriptor for successful multimodal image matching [15]. However, the method encounters two challenges when applied to large-scale datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, as a pioneering work, the LSS is first designed to capture the local structural features by measuring the correlations between the central patch and its neighbors, making the descriptor more robust against modality variations. Several LSS-based descriptors have been successfully applied to multimodal image registration, including dense LSS (DLSS) [29], dense rank-based LSS (DRLSS) [30], max-index-based LSS (MLSS) [31], histogram of oriented self-similarity (HOSS) [32], pyramid features of orientated self-similarity (POSS) [33], oriented self-similarity (OSS) [34], and adjacent self-similarity (ASS) [21]. Although these PC-based and LSS-based descriptors perform well, they still have some limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [30] constructed descriptors by combining the orientation information of phase congruency with the map of maximum index, which improved the robustness of descriptors. Based on the improved maximal selfsimilarity (IMSD) feature detector and the oriented self-similarity (OSS) feature descriptor, Xiong et al [31] registered image pairs successfully. Then, an optimized offset mean filtering (OMF) method was proposed to extract adjacent self-similarity (ASS) features, which improved registration efficiency and robustness [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%