2007
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2006.890845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Similarity: Part II—Optimal Estimation of Fractal Processes

Abstract: Abstract-In a companion paper (see Self-Similarity: Part I-Splines and Operators), we characterized the class of scale-invariant convolution operators: the generalized fractional derivatives of order . We used these operators to specify regularization functionals for a series of Tikhonov-like least-squares data fitting problems and proved that the general solution is a fractional spline of twice the order. We investigated the deterministic properties of these smoothing splines and proposed a fast Fourier trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(76 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is required instead is a special left-inverse of the fractional Laplacian that is dilationinvariant and p-integrable. Square-integrability in particular ( p = 2) is a strict requirement when the driving noise is Gaussian and has been considered in prior work [12]; it leads to a fractional Brownian field solution, which is the multi-dimensional extension of Mandelbrot's celebrated fractional Brownian motion [1,8]. Our desire to extend this method of solution for non-Gaussian brands of noise leads to the second question.…”
Section: ) Then I γ Is the Unique Continuous Linear Operator From mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is required instead is a special left-inverse of the fractional Laplacian that is dilationinvariant and p-integrable. Square-integrability in particular ( p = 2) is a strict requirement when the driving noise is Gaussian and has been considered in prior work [12]; it leads to a fractional Brownian field solution, which is the multi-dimensional extension of Mandelbrot's celebrated fractional Brownian motion [1,8]. Our desire to extend this method of solution for non-Gaussian brands of noise leads to the second question.…”
Section: ) Then I γ Is the Unique Continuous Linear Operator From mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is the natural L p extension of the fractional integral operator that was introduced in [1,12,13] for p = 2 and γ ∈ Z/2.…”
Section: ) Then I γ Is the Unique Continuous Linear Operator From mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will see that the full denoising process involves a stationary part-digital filtering and interpolation in a fractional spline space-and a non-stationary part which, in particular, ensures that the estimate vanishes at t = 0, just like an fBm [4]. Interestingly, we will establish that the best estimation of an fBm given its noisy samples is a fractional spline of degree 2γ where γ is the Hurst exponent of the fBm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The proof is somewhat technical and will be given elsewhere [4]. This result shows that the optimal estimation of the non-stationary signal B γ (t) is not a mere filtered version of the y k 's, as it would be the case in the stationary case.…”
Section: Theorem 1 the Optimal Estimate Ofmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation