1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00318417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-stabilization of neuronal networks

Abstract: Between the extreme views concerning ontogenesis (genetic vs. environmental determination), we use a moderate approach: a somehow pre-established neuronal model network reacts to activity deviations (reflecting input to be compensated), and stabilizes itself during a complex feed-back process. Morphogenesis is based on an algorithm formalizing the compensation theory of synaptogenesis (Wolff and Wagner 1983). This algorithm is applied to randomly connected McCulloch-Pitts networks that are able to maintain osc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lipton and Kater [45] showed that the deviation of the calcium concentration of a neuron from a certain target value determines its outgrowth. In line with previous modelling studies [10], [23], [24], [72], we defined a homeostatic value for which the axonal and dendritic offers (and with them the synaptic density) remains unchanged if equals . The rules for growth and retraction of continuous axonal supply and dendritic acceptance were taken from the modelling approach by Dammasch and Butz [23], [73] and can be described as follows: If the neuron has a too high membrane potential , hence a too high calcium concentration , the dendritic acceptance shrinks proportionally to a constant leading to a decrease of its input.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Lipton and Kater [45] showed that the deviation of the calcium concentration of a neuron from a certain target value determines its outgrowth. In line with previous modelling studies [10], [23], [24], [72], we defined a homeostatic value for which the axonal and dendritic offers (and with them the synaptic density) remains unchanged if equals . The rules for growth and retraction of continuous axonal supply and dendritic acceptance were taken from the modelling approach by Dammasch and Butz [23], [73] and can be described as follows: If the neuron has a too high membrane potential , hence a too high calcium concentration , the dendritic acceptance shrinks proportionally to a constant leading to a decrease of its input.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The last two parameters determine the connectivity which is a generalisation of synaptic weights and the number of synapses between neurons. In line with previous experimental [27], [45], [50] and modelling studies [23], [24], [71], [72], the processes which determine the dynamics of this system can be summarized very briefly as: The activity of each neuron affects its calcium concentration. This, in turn, specifies the change of the dendritic and axonal offers, hence, the connectivity which will then gradually influence activity and so on.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important driving force for network rewiring – as a main principle – is the need of every neuron to keep its firing rate within a functional, homeostatic range (Turrigiano, 1999; Wolff and Wagner, 1983; Wolff et al, 1989). The first models for a homeostatic structural network formation were independently proposed by Dammasch et al (1986, 1988) and van Ooyen (van Ooyen and van Pelt, 1994; van Ooyen et al, 1995). We joined the concepts of these two models to create a novel neural network model for activity-dependent structural plasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are important earlier models of homeostatic structural plasticity, such as the compensation model by Dammasch et al (Dammasch et al, 1986, 1988; Cromme and Dammasch, 1989; Butz and Teuchert-Noodt, 2006; Butz et al, 2006) and the activity-dependent neurite outgrowth model by van Ooyen (van Ooyen and van Pelt, 1994; Van Ooyen et al, 1995). The latter model, which studied the reciprocal interactions between neuronal activity and network formation, successfully accounted for experimental data on developing cell cultures (van Ooyen and van Pelt, 1994; van Oss and van Ooyen, 1997; Abbott and Rohrkemper, 2007; Tetzlaff et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%