2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Sterility in Camellia oleifera May Be Due to the Prezygotic Late-Acting Self-Incompatibility

Abstract: In this report, self-sterility in Camellia oleifera was explored by comparing structural and statistical characteristics following self-pollination (SP) and cross-pollination (CP). Although slightly delayed pollen germination and pollen tube growth in selfed ovaries compared to crossed ovaries was observed, there was no significant difference in the percentages of pollen that germinated and pollen tubes that grew to the base of the style. There was also no difference in morphological structure after the two po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
66
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
8
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the higher elongation rate for cross-pollination and lower rates for self-pollination in some cultivars while there was not a substantial difference in pollen tube elongation rate between cross-and selfpollination in some other cultivars . Liao et al (2014) also supportively depicted that the growth speed of crossed pollen tubes of C. oleifera was slightly faster than selfed pollen tubes as pollen tubes reached style base at 48 h after cross-pollination and 60 h after self-pollination. Comparable remarks were reported by Simura and Oosone (1956) where, in crossed flowers the pollen tubes grew rapidly and reached funiculus base in about 36 to 40 h after pollination, while in selfed flowers they grew uniformly and scarcely reached it by 72 h. Moreover, pollen tubes grew slower in styles of a different species and protruded ovules within 3 to 5 days after pollination (interspecific crosses) whereas that of within the same species (intraspecific crosses) occurs within 1-2 days after pollination (Hwang et al, 1992).…”
Section: In-vivo Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growthsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was found that the higher elongation rate for cross-pollination and lower rates for self-pollination in some cultivars while there was not a substantial difference in pollen tube elongation rate between cross-and selfpollination in some other cultivars . Liao et al (2014) also supportively depicted that the growth speed of crossed pollen tubes of C. oleifera was slightly faster than selfed pollen tubes as pollen tubes reached style base at 48 h after cross-pollination and 60 h after self-pollination. Comparable remarks were reported by Simura and Oosone (1956) where, in crossed flowers the pollen tubes grew rapidly and reached funiculus base in about 36 to 40 h after pollination, while in selfed flowers they grew uniformly and scarcely reached it by 72 h. Moreover, pollen tubes grew slower in styles of a different species and protruded ovules within 3 to 5 days after pollination (interspecific crosses) whereas that of within the same species (intraspecific crosses) occurs within 1-2 days after pollination (Hwang et al, 1992).…”
Section: In-vivo Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growthsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Tanaka (1988) and Liao et al (2014) reinforced our appraisal by particular studies on self-incompatibility in the genus Camellia. Aside from the normal growth of pollen tubes we observed an unusual zigzag growth at very low frequency in self and remote intraspecific crosses.…”
Section: In-vivo Pollen Germination and Pollen Tube Growthmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Ktze. [34]. Furthermore, the pollen tubes did not penetrate the ovule after self-pollination ( Figure 4E).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, the pollen tubes did not penetrate the ovule after self-pollination ( Figure 4E). This may be the result of the generation of resistant materials in the ovule or micropyle (e.g., callose) that prevented the self-pollinated pollen tubes from penetrating the ovule [34]. Fruit and seed set is the standard by which mating success is estimated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%