2015
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b06852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Sterilizing, Self-Cleaning Mixed Polymeric Multifunctional Antimicrobial Surfaces

Abstract: Mitigation of bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation is quickly becoming a strategy for the prevention of hospital-acquired infections. We demonstrate a basic strategy for surface modification that combines the ability to control attachment by microbes with the ability to inactivate microbes. The surface consists of two active materials: poly(p-phenylene ethynylene)-based polymers, which can inactivate a wide range of microbes and pathogens, and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-based polymers, which ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this strategy, a series of smart antibacterial coatings were developed by integration of bactericidal components with temperature‐responsive polymers (such as PNIPAAm or poly( N ‐vinylcaprolactam) (PVCL)). In most cases, the two functional components were introduced to the surface in form of either copolymer brushes or mixed polymer brushes and thus multistep reactions are needed. In contrast, a AgNP/PNIPAAm hybrid film prepared using a one‐step photopolymerization method showed a more facial and reliable approach to design a film with smart antibacterial activity .…”
Section: Smart “Kill‐and‐release” Antibacterial Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this strategy, a series of smart antibacterial coatings were developed by integration of bactericidal components with temperature‐responsive polymers (such as PNIPAAm or poly( N ‐vinylcaprolactam) (PVCL)). In most cases, the two functional components were introduced to the surface in form of either copolymer brushes or mixed polymer brushes and thus multistep reactions are needed. In contrast, a AgNP/PNIPAAm hybrid film prepared using a one‐step photopolymerization method showed a more facial and reliable approach to design a film with smart antibacterial activity .…”
Section: Smart “Kill‐and‐release” Antibacterial Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, the bacterial‐killing components include quaternary ammonium groups, poly( p ‐phenylene ethynylene), poly[2‐(methacryloyloxy)‐ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride, poly( N,N ‐dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), antibacterial peptides, lysozyme, etc. The bacterial‐repelling components include polyethylene glycol (PEG), zwitterionic polymers, poly( N ‐isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAAm), etc.…”
Section: Multifunctional Antibacterial Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…polymer coatings that control the release of antimicrobial agents (antibiotics, silver ions or nanoparticles), and/or mixed polymers with self-cleaning and self-sterilization properties 9 ; c) inorganic coatings with intrinsic antimicrobial activity such as titanium dioxide, a well-known photosensitizer upon UV light irradiation that provides a high rate of bacterial inactivation 10 .…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the high bactericidal effect of silver loaded ormosil films was reached even in the case of POrs-Ag which does not contain CS particles and presented a slightly lower formation of AgNPs.Although P. aeruginosa showed an exceptional ability to colonize non-loaded metal ormosil substrates, the incorporation of AgNPs into the film decreased dramatically its viability attaining self-sterilization. Much effort has been devoted to the development of biomaterials with effective antimicrobial properties for medical devices in order to prevent biofilms-related infection.Recently Pappas et al9 developed an innovative mixed polymeric surface to inactivate bacterial pathogens. Even though this polymeric material shows promising application as an antimicrobial surface, it was not able to reach the total killing of the attached bacteria (20-30% of the initial inoculum remained viable).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%