2006
DOI: 10.1080/17425960600557462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Study of the Craft of Faculty Team Teaching in a Non-Traditional Teacher Education Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This qualitative, multi-site study documents teaching and learning in university classrooms. As educators with vested interests in knowing and improving our own educational spaces, as well as the spaces of the pre/inservice teachers we work with, our methods draw from teacher action research (Anderson et al, 2003;Hubbard & Power, 2003;Pine, 2009;Sagoury & Power, 2012) and collective self-study (Samaras et al, 2006;Pithouse-Morgan & Samaras, 2019). We took action in our teaching spaces, in collaboration with one another, investigating our use of open-ended, arts-based literacy practices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This qualitative, multi-site study documents teaching and learning in university classrooms. As educators with vested interests in knowing and improving our own educational spaces, as well as the spaces of the pre/inservice teachers we work with, our methods draw from teacher action research (Anderson et al, 2003;Hubbard & Power, 2003;Pine, 2009;Sagoury & Power, 2012) and collective self-study (Samaras et al, 2006;Pithouse-Morgan & Samaras, 2019). We took action in our teaching spaces, in collaboration with one another, investigating our use of open-ended, arts-based literacy practices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While drawing from action research scholarship individually, our collaboration became a form of collective self-study. For Samaras et al (2006), in self-study, "Each team member brings … personal perspectives, disciplines, and understandings to each task," and "These voices represent multiple perspectives on the processes of teacher and faculty development" (p. 44). Our collective critical dialogue pushed us to challenge our "own ideas as well as to challenge [one another's] assumptions about teaching," seeing such collaborative "peer scaffolding… [as] an important path to [our] professional development" (p. 44).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A faculty self-study group is another forum for supporting faculty teaching. Teacher educators have typically been the participants in self-study groups (Grierson, Tessaro, Cantalini-Williams, Grant, & Dention, 2010; Hoban, 2007; Kitchen, Parker, & Gallagher, 2008; Lunenberg, Zwart, & Korthagen, 2010; Samaras, Kayler, Rigsby, Weller, & Wilcox, 2006). In our faculty self-study group, however, the majority of participants were not teacher educators.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pham and Renshaw (2013) recommend teachers (especially Asian) to leave the burden of individualism aside and switch to construct knowledge collaboratively; this requires critical reflection on one's own practice, as well as learning an art of nurturing, mentoring and coaching others. Moreover, it is essential to conduct self-studies and document one's findings to disseminate to others (Samaras, Kayler, Rigsby, Weller and Wilcox, 2006). Thus, following Glasser (1999), teachers need to adopt a lead manager's role and learn to do power sharing with their students, be trustful, make them feel responsible, and teach them self-management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%