2021
DOI: 10.1109/tsm.2020.3038165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Wafer Bin Map Defect Pattern Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first trained six networks: ResNet18 23 , AlexNet 24 , and VGG16 25 , DenseNet121 31 , GoogLeNet 32 , and SqueezeNet 33 with the training set. These models are well known and have performed well when adapted to the classification of defected patterns in wafer bin maps 26 – 28 , 34 , 35 . The key salient features of these models are shown in Supplementary file .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first trained six networks: ResNet18 23 , AlexNet 24 , and VGG16 25 , DenseNet121 31 , GoogLeNet 32 , and SqueezeNet 33 with the training set. These models are well known and have performed well when adapted to the classification of defected patterns in wafer bin maps 26 – 28 , 34 , 35 . The key salient features of these models are shown in Supplementary file .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These popular CNN models have been widely used in many applications and show their robustness. Many researchers 26 – 28 showed they have achieved the highest classification accuracy using these models for wafer map defect pattern identification. The network architecture of these models is shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experienced inspector can identify the cause of defect depending on the WBM's pattern. The process of manually inspecting these defects is time consuming and may be affected by the fatigue's level of the inspector, especially because modern semiconductors manufacturers produce several thousands of wafers every week [5], [6]. Therefore, many semiconductor manufacturing are investigating this problem using machine learning and computer vision techniques to perform automatic defect detection [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, when a traditional classification algorithm is applied to an imbalance dataset, it often tends to support majority class instances while ignoring minority class instances in order to increase over classification accuracy although the minority class instances are often more informative to the application. Therefore, many useful approaches have been developed to achieve a better class‐instance distribution and to improve the classification performance 18–25 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many useful approaches have been developed to achieve a better class-instance distribution and to improve the classification performance. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Furthermore, it is known that wafer warpage is one of the main root causes leading to a die failure (i.e., defect) in semiconductor manufacturing. 26 As the thickness of the wafer decreases and large stresses are induced during manufacturing processes such as film deposition, CMP, lithography, etch, and various thermal processes, an increasing trend of wafer warpage has been seen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%