2015
DOI: 10.1007/jhep10(2015)177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-tuning at large (distances): 4D description of runaway dilaton capture

Abstract: Abstract:We complete here a three-part study (see also arXiv:1506.08095 and arXiv:1508.00856) of how codimension-two objects back-react gravitationally with their environment, with particular interest in situations where the transverse 'bulk' is stabilized by the interplay between gravity and flux-quantization in a dilaton-Maxwell-Einstein system such as commonly appears in higher-dimensional supergravity and is used in the Supersymmetric Large Extra Dimensions (SLED) program. Such systems enjoy a classical fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integration over the transverse space can be regarded as projecting the field equations onto the zero mode in these directions, and so (3.83) can be interpreted as the equation that determines the value of the dilaton zero-mode. (This conclusion is also shown more explicitly from the point of view of the effective d-dimensional theory in a forthcoming analysis [69].) In the absence of the sources this zero mode is an exact flat direction of the classical equations associated with the scale invariance of the bulk field equations (for instance X B = 0 for the source-free Salam-Sezgin solution [70]) and the vortex contribution to (3.83) expresses how this flat direction becomes fixed when the sources are not scale-invariant.…”
Section: Dilatonmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Integration over the transverse space can be regarded as projecting the field equations onto the zero mode in these directions, and so (3.83) can be interpreted as the equation that determines the value of the dilaton zero-mode. (This conclusion is also shown more explicitly from the point of view of the effective d-dimensional theory in a forthcoming analysis [69].) In the absence of the sources this zero mode is an exact flat direction of the classical equations associated with the scale invariance of the bulk field equations (for instance X B = 0 for the source-free Salam-Sezgin solution [70]) and the vortex contribution to (3.83) expresses how this flat direction becomes fixed when the sources are not scale-invariant.…”
Section: Dilatonmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…We do so by adding new scalar and gauge fields that admit such vortex solutions, with a view to understanding in more detail how near-source behaviour is controlled by the source properties. Because our focus here is mostly on classical issues we do not explicitly embed the new sector into a supersymmetric framework, but we return to this issue when considering quantum corrections in subsequent analysis [69].…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)054mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although extra-dimensional branes are not in themselves expected to be sufficient to provide a solution (for instance, one must also deal with the higher-dimensional cosmological constant), the techniques developed here can also be applied to their supersymmetric alternatives [42][43][44], for which higher-derivative cosmological constants are forbidden by supersymmetry and whose ultimate prospects remain open at this point. We make this application in a companion paper [45,46].…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)049mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, we plan [45,46] to also apply these techniques to a supersymmetric brane-world models that aim to tackle the cosmological constant problem [42][43][44]. The back-reaction of branes is a crucial ingredient of such models, and understanding the system in greater detail with an explicit UV completion will put these models on firmer ground and hopefully shed light on new angles from which to attack the CC problem.…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)049mentioning
confidence: 99%