2006 IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics 2006
DOI: 10.1109/ramech.2006.252626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-Tuning Control for Rotation Type Inverted Pendulum Using Two Kinds of Adaptive Controllers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplified expression is also similar to that derived by Baba et al [11] (after accounting for the different reference frame), with the exception of the sign of the term m 2 L 1 l 2 sin(θ 2 )θ 2 2 which is opposite (and incorrect). The simplified derivations of [9,10] differ because of an erroneous 1/2 term in the offdiagonal elements of the mass matrix. It should be noted that the above differential equation differs slightly with that derived by almost all others including Furuta et al, as well as the texts by Fantoni and Lozano [7] and by Egeland and Gravdahl [8], because of the full inertia tensor employed here.…”
Section: Journal Of Control Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simplified expression is also similar to that derived by Baba et al [11] (after accounting for the different reference frame), with the exception of the sign of the term m 2 L 1 l 2 sin(θ 2 )θ 2 2 which is opposite (and incorrect). The simplified derivations of [9,10] differ because of an erroneous 1/2 term in the offdiagonal elements of the mass matrix. It should be noted that the above differential equation differs slightly with that derived by almost all others including Furuta et al, as well as the texts by Fantoni and Lozano [7] and by Egeland and Gravdahl [8], because of the full inertia tensor employed here.…”
Section: Journal Of Control Science and Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few authors [2,4,5,[9][10][11] have considered slender symmetric pendulums where the moments of inertia for two of the principal axes are equal and the remaining moment of inertia is zero. Of the dozens of publications surveyed for this paper, only a single conference paper [12] and journal paper [13] were found to include all three principal inertial terms of the pendulum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%