2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11784-007-0046-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selfcoincidences and roots in Nielsen theory

Abstract: Abstract. Given two maps f 1 and f 2 from the sphere S m to an n-manifold N , when are they loose, i.e. when can they be deformed away from one another? We study the geometry of their (generic) coincidence locus and its Nielsen decomposition. On one hand the resulting bordism class of coincidence data and the corresponding Nielsen numbers are strong looseness obstructions. On the other hand the values which these invariants may possibly assume turn out to satisfy severe restrictions, e.g. the Nielsen numbers c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Versions very close to that stated below can be found in [21] Corollary 3.3 and [9]; see, also, [24]. Proof.…”
Section: Given By the Inclusion Of Null(s) In H-null(s) The Homotopysupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Versions very close to that stated below can be found in [21] Corollary 3.3 and [9]; see, also, [24]. Proof.…”
Section: Given By the Inclusion Of Null(s) In H-null(s) The Homotopysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In a series of recent papers [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Koschorke has studied, by differential-topological methods, when B is a closed manifold, rather than a general ENR, what we shall call the homotopy coincidence index. This index is an element of a certain stable homotopy group and in a range of dimensions (dim B < 2(dim N − 1)) it is the precise obstruction to the existence of a deformation of e and f to maps with empty coincidence set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the topological degree, it is a homotopy invariant and does not change under small perturbations of f . For pairs of maps f 1 , f 2 : M m → N n between compact manifolds of different dimensions m, n, Nielsen theory has been applied to compute a lower bound for the number of connected components of the coincidence set f 1 = f 2 , where f i f i are homotopic for i = 1, 2 [32,33]. Surprisingly, the author of [32] shows that under the condition m ≤ 2n − 3-the same as our stable dimension range-a computable number N (f 1 , f 2 ) coincides with the minimal number of connected components of…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like the topological degree, it is a homotopy invariant and does not change under small perturbations of f . For pairs of maps f 1 , f 2 : M m → N n between compact manifolds of different dimensions m, n, Nielsen theory has been applied to compute a lower bound for the number of connected components of the coincidence set f 1 = f 2 , where f i f i are homotopic for i = 1, 2 [32,33]. Surprisingly, the author of [32] shows that under the condition m ≤ 2n − 3-the same as our stable dimension range-a computable number N (f 1 , f 2 ) coincides with the minimal number of connected components of {f 1 = f 2 } for f 1 resp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%