2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Selling Our Own Skin:’ Social dispossession through microcredit in rural Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The threat of decline of rural communities in Khulna is at odds with the visions of rural futures propagated by peasant social movements that have mobilized in this region for decades (Adnan 1993;Paprocki and Cons 2014). 2 These movements locate the threats to their lives and livelihoods not in climate change but in agrarian dispossession resulting in particular from a transition to shrimp aquaculture and in deep structural inequalities in land and labor relations (Paprocki 2015;Paprocki and Huq 2017).…”
Section: Adapting Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The threat of decline of rural communities in Khulna is at odds with the visions of rural futures propagated by peasant social movements that have mobilized in this region for decades (Adnan 1993;Paprocki and Cons 2014). 2 These movements locate the threats to their lives and livelihoods not in climate change but in agrarian dispossession resulting in particular from a transition to shrimp aquaculture and in deep structural inequalities in land and labor relations (Paprocki 2015;Paprocki and Huq 2017).…”
Section: Adapting Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these NGOs increasingly took responsibility for social welfare activities, such as education, health care, and the delivery of drinking water, the provision of services that were formerly considered the purview of the state was increasingly privatized (Feldman 1997;White 1999). In the process, accountability for the provision of these services and the welfare entitlements of citizens were scaled back (Wood 1997), and the provision of market-based development mechanisms such as microcredit was scaled up (Paprocki 2016). The rise of Bangladesh's NGO sector was linked with the country's expansive capitalist market reforms through comprehensive structural adjustment.…”
Section: Development Regimes In Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() found that the determinants of technical efficiency in rice farming in Bangladesh are farm size; farmer's level of education; experience in production; and access to microcredit, training, and extension. However, Islam () describes the diverse impacts of microcredit programs, while Paprocki () notes the limitations of microcredit for agricultural improvement: “The lack of support of microcredit programs for smallholder agriculture is apparent in the repayment structure, which requires borrowers to begin making payments on their loans the week immediately after borrowing. This structure is common to every major NGO microcredit program in Bangladesh.” This means that microcredit is not suitable for investments, such as buying land, where rewards will not be seen until the harvest.…”
Section: Rice Agriculture Systems In Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microcredit has become an important part of the development and economic climate in Bangladesh. Developed in the 1980s, microcredit now engages nearly two thirds of people in Bangladesh (Paprocki, 2016), through a process whereby economic collateral is replaced with a system of social groups, with a particular focus on women. Kabeer et al (2011) argue that microcredit has facilitated a significant increase in women's informal employment and economic activity.…”
Section: Adaptation In Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of crises or natural disasters, borrowing can manifest as an unsustainable coping strategy, rather than an opportunity for sustained adaptation (Del Ninno, Dorosh, & Smith, 2003). More broadly, microcredit has been seen as a tool for the promotion of neoliberal economics, dispossession and exclusion (Paprocki, 2016;Weber, 2014). Microcredit also aligns with a poverty-focused approach to vulnerability, whereby economic poverty is seen as a key barrier to resilience suffered by people living in exposed areas, which can be amended from a "traditional economic development perspective" (Parvin & Johnson, 2015: 889).…”
Section: Adaptation In Bangladeshmentioning
confidence: 99%