2016
DOI: 10.1080/08853134.2016.1208100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selling with technology: understanding the resistance to mobile sales assistant use in retailing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
13
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, 'Uses & Gratification Theory' provides frameworks that could be applied to identify a gratification potential of smartwatches. Finally, future research could also apply resistance theories (e.g., Spreer & Rauschnabel, 2016) to understand the adoption and resistance to wearables. These theories could be particular important in situation where smartwatches replace traditional watches.…”
Section: Author-supplied Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, 'Uses & Gratification Theory' provides frameworks that could be applied to identify a gratification potential of smartwatches. Finally, future research could also apply resistance theories (e.g., Spreer & Rauschnabel, 2016) to understand the adoption and resistance to wearables. These theories could be particular important in situation where smartwatches replace traditional watches.…”
Section: Author-supplied Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors resolved any differences through iteration and discussion, with reference to the full text of the articles under consideration. (Avlonitis & Karayanni, 2000) ▪ Participation in electronic markets (Grewal et al, 2001) ▪ E-readiness (Berthon, Pitt, Berthon, Campbell, & Thwaites, 2008) ▪ Website (Chakraborty, Lala, & Warren, 2002) ▪ Web-based portal (Clarke III & Flaherty, 2003) ▪ E-marketplace (Eng, 2004) Multichannel (13 appearances) ▪ Channel integration (Long et al, 2007) ▪ Channel coordination (Osmonbekov et al, 2009) ▪ Multi-channel capability (Kabadayi et al, 2007) ▪ Hybrid sales structure (Thaichon et al, 2018) Mobile (3 appearances) ▪ Mobile device usage (Müller et al, 2018) ▪ Mobile sales assistants (Spreer & Rauschnabel, 2016) ▪ Mobile app (Gill et al, 2017) Theme 2: Social Media Social Media (34 appearances) ▪ Social media use (Agnihotri, Kothandaraman, Kashyap, & Singh, 2012) ▪ Social media messaging (Swani et al, 2014) ▪ Social media knowledge (Nguyen, Yu, Melewar, & Chen, 2015) ▪ Social CRM technologies (Trainor, 2012) ▪ Social media community (Wang, Hsiao, Yang, & Hajli, 2016) ▪ Positive customer reviews (Steward et al, 2018) (Keramati, Mehrabi, & Mojir, 2010) ▪ Video conferencing usage (Hardwick & Anderson, 2019) ▪ Digital CRM (Keramati et al, 2010) ▪ CRM technology (Agnihotri et al, 2017) Employees (4 appearances) ▪ Implementing technological change (Sarin et al, 2010) ▪ Technology capability (Lassk et al, 2012) ▪ Salesperson social media competency (Guesalaga, 2016) ▪ Digitalization for internal branding (Li et al, 2018) Theme 4: Digital Technologies Technologies (18 appearances) ▪ IT capability (Grewal et al, 2001) ▪ Artificial intelligence and machine learning…”
Section: Classifying Digital Marketing Capabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As technology advanced, mobile media became an important channel for B2B firms. For example, Spreer and Rauschnabel (2016) identified six factors that inhibit the use of mobile devices in sales assistance. In addition, others have investigated the benefits of using mobile apps as a resource for customer engagement and found that such initiatives result in higher sales through empowering business customer to participate (Gill, Sridhar, & Grewal, 2017).…”
Section: Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing knowledge has been extended by the current study by incorporating innovation as a mediator in accordance with RBV theory. SFP has been analysed by RBV and technology theory (Spreer & Rauschnabel, 2016). The sustainable performance of businesses in Thailand can be enhanced as per the results of this study.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 95%