1983
DOI: 10.3147/jsfp.18.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEM observation on the mouth tube and preoral sting of Argulus coregoni thorell and Argulus japonicus Thiele (Crustacea: Branchiura).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current study two axon-like (Ax) structures were found within the spine duct epithelium. The presence of these axons supports the results of Gresty et al [14] and hypothesis of Shimura [12] that the other pore at the tip of the pre-oral spine functions as a chemoreceptor. Large elongated nuclei were also observed by Gresty et al [14] with clear dense nucleoli, but these latter were rarely seen in the current study, likely due to the parasite orientation during embedding and the depth of sectioning.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the current study two axon-like (Ax) structures were found within the spine duct epithelium. The presence of these axons supports the results of Gresty et al [14] and hypothesis of Shimura [12] that the other pore at the tip of the pre-oral spine functions as a chemoreceptor. Large elongated nuclei were also observed by Gresty et al [14] with clear dense nucleoli, but these latter were rarely seen in the current study, likely due to the parasite orientation during embedding and the depth of sectioning.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, the origin of the duct was found to be integrated with glandular tissue at the base of the spinal sheath. By analysing scanning electron micrographs of the pre-oral spine on the ventral side Gresty et al [14]were able to describe the spine pores; spine duct and subterminal pore, which is not connected to the dorsal tube, previously assumed by Shimura [12] to be a chemosensory pore. Gresty et al [14] also found axon-like structures within the epithelium around the base of the spine duct.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Argulus quadristriatus bears only one posterior spine on the proximal segment of antennule in both sexes and thereby differs from five of the above species (A. caecus, A. kusafugu, A. matuii, A. onodai, A. scutiformis), which carry two posterior spines, as well as from A. lepidostei, which lacks any posterior spines (see Kellicott 1877;Wilson 1902Wilson , 1916Wilson , 1922Thiele 1904;Tokioka 1936;Sikama 1938;Yamaguti and Yamasu 1959). Argulus americanus, A. coregoni, and A. japonicus differ from A. quadristriatus in having no spines or scales on the basal half of the mouthtube (vs. ornamented with scale-like spines) (see Tokioka 1936;Wang 1958;Yeatman 1965;Cressey 1972;Shimura 1983;Shimura and Asai 1984). According to , several unidentified species of the genus Argulus reported from Japanese waters were probably A. coregoni, A.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the male specimens consisted of individuals of 5.3-8.1 mm in body length (Fig. 2), and Shimura & Egusa (1980, reported as O. masou), Shimura (1981Shimura ( , 1983aShimura ( , 1983b, Shimura et al (1983aShimura et al ( , 1983b, Shimura & Inoue (1984, reported as O. masou) 4 Oncorhynchus mykiss Shimura & Egusa (1980, reported as Salmo gairdneri), Shimura (1981Shimura ( , 1983a, reported as S. gairdneri), Shimura et al (1983b, reported Oncorhynchus mykiss Uno et al (1975), Ishii et al(1978 9…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%