2005
DOI: 10.1007/11424857_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Annotation of Biomedical Literature Using Google

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Google is one of the most popular large-scale hypertextual web search engine in terms of audience reach and time spent searching, due to its ability to crawl and index the web in a very efficient way (Brin and Page 1998). Moreover promising biology-related results from previous work using the Internet Search Engine Google for semantic annotation of biomedical literature (Saetre et al 2005a) and annotation of protein interactions (Saetre et al 2005b) has been reported. In this work we used a specialized flavour of Google (currently in its beta version), Google Scholar that provides a way to search for scholarly literature across many disciplines and sources: peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts and articles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Google is one of the most popular large-scale hypertextual web search engine in terms of audience reach and time spent searching, due to its ability to crawl and index the web in a very efficient way (Brin and Page 1998). Moreover promising biology-related results from previous work using the Internet Search Engine Google for semantic annotation of biomedical literature (Saetre et al 2005a) and annotation of protein interactions (Saetre et al 2005b) has been reported. In this work we used a specialized flavour of Google (currently in its beta version), Google Scholar that provides a way to search for scholarly literature across many disciplines and sources: peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts and articles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Compared with PANKOW, Alchymoogle (Saetre et al 2005) works in the more specific domain of biomedicine, which uses 275 different semantic tags, much more than the 59 concepts for general phrases in the ontology used by PANKOW. Similarly, Alchymoogle utilizes Google for semantic annotation (extracting is-a relations specifically).…”
Section: Frequency Statistics-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NLTK has been used successfully as a teaching tool, as an individual study tool, and as a platform for prototyping and building research systems (Liddy and McCracken, 2005;Saetre et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%