DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-72667-8_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Composition of Lecture Subparts for a Personalized e-Learning

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we propose an algorithm for personalized learning based on a user's query and a repository of lecture subparts -i.e., learning objects-both are described in a subset of OWL-DL. It works in two steps. First, it retrieves lecture subparts that cover as much as possible the user's query. The solution is based on the concept covering problem for which we present a modified algorithm. Second, an appropriate sequence of lecture subparts is generated. Indeed, the different lecture subparts are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Karam, et al (2007) assemble learning objects by inferring the best "composition flow" using the current user knowledge state and the domain ontology. Description logic is used to solve the "concept-covering problem", which corresponds to the knowledge need of the current user.…”
Section: Metadata-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Karam, et al (2007) assemble learning objects by inferring the best "composition flow" using the current user knowledge state and the domain ontology. Description logic is used to solve the "concept-covering problem", which corresponds to the knowledge need of the current user.…”
Section: Metadata-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semantic search engine that we used is described in detail in [11]. It infers over the OWL-DL metadata and computes how much the description matches the query.…”
Section: Search Enginesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, relying on standard services and on RDQL, such systems cannot deal with approximation nor provide explanation services. An alternative proposal of integration may be found in [70], in which the composition of learning objects is based on the solution of a Concept Covering problem defined in terms of LCS computation. Such an approach, although dealing with approximation, does not provide explanation facilities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%