2008 International Conference on Autonomic Computing 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icac.2008.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic-Driven Model Composition for Accurate Anomaly Diagnosis

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a semantic-driven approach to system modeling for improving the accuracy of anomaly diagnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classifier is learned via supervised learning by annotating sets of system metric values with failure states. Ghanbari and Amza [9] combine models for anomaly detection on individual components together into a single belief network, modelling the structure and causal relationships of components. Learning based on observing injected faults is performed to refine the model and the probabilities associated with the causal relationships.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classifier is learned via supervised learning by annotating sets of system metric values with failure states. Ghanbari and Amza [9] combine models for anomaly detection on individual components together into a single belief network, modelling the structure and causal relationships of components. Learning based on observing injected faults is performed to refine the model and the probabilities associated with the causal relationships.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires a pre-classified training data set and don't dynamically adapt system to the changing conditions. Ghanbari and Amza [23] train belief networks that represent complex systems by injecting failures. At the outset, experts model a belief network that describes the dependencies within a system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, supervised learning is used such that any recurrent faults can be identified quickly if they were to occur again. Such methods [10], [11], [12] use either Bayesian or neural networks to learn fault symptoms from labeled data. While such efforts significantly improve diagnosis, they suffer from the important drawback that prior fault knowledge is required to diagnose a fault successfully.…”
Section: Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%