2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Image Manipulation Using Scene Graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On top, attributes highlight the properties of the object in more detail but are rarely used in practice. The effectiveness of scene graphs has been demonstrated when solving different scene understanding tasks including image retrieval (Liu et al 2007;Johnson et al 2015), scene captioning (Yang et al 2019), visual question answering (Teney et al 2017) or image generation from graphs alone (Johnson et al 2018), interactively (Ashual and Wolf 2019) or for image editing tasks (Mittal et al 2019;Dhamo et al 2020). Many of these methods either rely, or build upon, image-based scene graph prediction, a particularly well studied problem (Lu et al 2016a;Peyre et al 2017;Xu et al 2017;Newell and Deng 2017;Li et al 2017;Yang et al 2018;Zellers et al 2018;Li et al 2018c;Herzig et al 2018;Zareian et al 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On top, attributes highlight the properties of the object in more detail but are rarely used in practice. The effectiveness of scene graphs has been demonstrated when solving different scene understanding tasks including image retrieval (Liu et al 2007;Johnson et al 2015), scene captioning (Yang et al 2019), visual question answering (Teney et al 2017) or image generation from graphs alone (Johnson et al 2018), interactively (Ashual and Wolf 2019) or for image editing tasks (Mittal et al 2019;Dhamo et al 2020). Many of these methods either rely, or build upon, image-based scene graph prediction, a particularly well studied problem (Lu et al 2016a;Peyre et al 2017;Xu et al 2017;Newell and Deng 2017;Li et al 2017;Yang et al 2018;Zellers et al 2018;Li et al 2018c;Herzig et al 2018;Zareian et al 2020).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…support relations (Nathan Silberman Derek Hoiem and Fergus 2012). Such a representation is frequently used in the image domain for higher-level task such as partial (Wang et al 2014) and full image retrieval (Johnson et al 2015), image generation (Johnson et al 2018) or even manipulation (Mittal et al 2019;Dhamo et al 2020). While 2D scene graph datasets such as Visual Genome (Krishna et al 2017) or NYUv2 (Nathan Silberman Derek Hoiem and Fergus 2012) are widely available and feature relationships between scene instances and often instance attributes, scene graphs in 3D have not been explored much.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Johnson et al [18] introduced the reverse task of image generation from scene graphs, using a 2D layout as an intermediate representation between graphs and images, where layouts are decoded to images using a Cascade Refinement Network (CRN) [4] architecture. Later, a similar architecture was explored for image generation in an interactive form [1] as well as for semantic image manipulation [6]. Herzig et al [12] proposed a model that uses canonical scene graphs, to improve robustness in terms of graph size and noise.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from the aforementioned methods, Dhamo et al [6] focused on image manipulation and produced modified images from the edited scene graphs. Yet, this method requires both the original image and the corresponding scene graph as the supervision, it cannot generate target samples freely.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%