Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources

Abstract

Providing an integrated access to multiple heterogeneous sources is a challenging issue in global information systems for cooperation and interoperability. In this context, two fundamental problems arise. • First, how to determine if the sources contain semantically related information, that is, information related to the same or similar real-world concept(s). Second, how to handle semantic heterogeneity to support integration and uniform query interfaces. Complicating factors with respect to conventional view integration techniques are related to the fact that the sources to be integrated already exist and that semantic heterogeneity occurs on the large-scale, involving terminology, structure, and context of the involved sources, with respect to geographical, organizational, and functional aspects related to information use. Moreover, to meet the requirements of global, Internet-based information systems, it is important that tools developed for supporting these activities are semi-automatic and scalable as much as possible. The goal of this paper is to describe the MOMIS [4, 5] (Mediator envirOnment for Multiple Information Sources) approach to the integration and query of multiple, heterogeneous information sources, containing structured and semistructured data. MOMIS has been conceived as a joint collaboration between University of Milano and Modena in the framework of the INTERDATA national research project, aiming at providing methods and tools for data management in Internet-based information systems. Like other integration projects [1, 10, 14], MOMIS follows a "semantic approach" to information integration based on the conceptual schema, or metadata, of the information sources, and on the following architectural elements: i) a common object-oriented data model, defined according to the ODLxs language, to describe source schemas for integration purposes. The data model and ODLxs have been defined in MOMIS as subset of the ODMG-93 ones, following the proposal for a standard mediator language developed by the I3/POB working group [7]. In addition, ODLxs introduces new constructors to support the semantic integration process [4, 5]; ii) one or more wrappers, to translate schema descriptions into the common ODLIs representation; iii) a mediator and a query-processing component, based on two p~e-existing tools, namely ARTEMIS [8] and ODB-Tools [3] (available on Internet at http://sparc20.dsi.unimo.it/), to provide an 13 architecture for integration and query optimization. In this paper, we focus on capturing and reasoning about semantic aspects of schema descriptions of heterogeneous information sources for supporting integration and query optimization. Both semistructured and structured data sources are taken into account [5]. A Common Thesaurus is constructed, which has the role of a shared ontology for the information sources. The Common Thesaurus is built by analyzing ODLI3 descriptions of the sources, by exploiting the Description Logics OLCD (Object Language with Complements allowing Descriptive cycles) [...

S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching

“…The academy example describes courses taught at Cornell University (mini) and at the University of Washington (mini). 1 Table 3 provides some indicators of the complexity of the test schemas. As match quality measures we have used the following indicators: precision, recall, overall, F-measure (from [3]) and time (from [19]).…”

“…These approaches, though implicitly or explicitly exploiting the semantic information codified in graphs, differ substantially from our approach in that, instead of computing semantic relations between nodes, they compute syntactic "similarity" coefficients between labels, in the [0,1] range. Some examples of previous solutions are [12], [1], [15], [18], [5], [10]; see [6] for an in depth discussion about syntactic and semantic matching.…”

A Large Scale Taxonomy Mapping Evaluation

“…Many diverse solutions to the matching problem have been proposed so far, see for example surveys in [20,21] and concrete solutions [13,15,6,18,24,3,19,17,8], etc. Unfortunately nearly all of them suffer from the lack of evaluation.…”

MIKS: An Agent Framework Supporting Information Access and Integration

“…Within the MOMIS (Mediator envirOnment for Multiple Information Sources) project [17,6,16], we ourself have experienced the design and implementation of an object-oriented client-server integration system, that follows the architecture above presented. The MOMIS system has obviously been conceived to provide an integrated access to heterogeneous information stored in traditional databases (e.g., relational, object oriented) or file systems, as well as in semistructured sources (XML files in particular).…”