Semantic modeling for education of library and information sciences in Iran, based on Soft Systems Methodology

Abstract

Reviewing the recently published texts in the field of library and information science education indicates some fundamental problems in this pedagogic process. According to different factors dealing with the process, confronting the challenges is considered as complex issues. Therefore, in this research Soft Systems Methodology, an action research method, was chosen to propose a comprehensive model to solve the mentioned problems. Based on the Checkland seven proposed stages, the problem situation was identified, and then it was expressed in the form of a rich picture. Driving root definitions and the CATWOE model were cleared to accomplish the conceptual model. Comparison of the conceptual model to the real world, also proposing feasible and desired changes are the fifth and sixth stages of the research. Finally, taking action to improve the current situation in the field of LIS education finished the procedure. Utilizing the steps of Soft Systems Methodology, this research draws the rich picture illustrating the process of LIS education and its issues dealing with the related ecosystem. Accordingly, the final model consisting of three ontologies was attained. To validate the semantic model, Cohen’s kappa coefficient was calculated. The model, approved by high level of expert agreement, not only can be an appropriate solution for the problems involved in library and information science education in Iran, but also can be considered as a pattern for future researches in designation and implementation of a semantic model of education in other disciplines.

Combining Value-Focused thinking and soft systems methodology: A systemic framework to structure the planning process at a special educational needs school in Brazil

“…Guiding an intervention by objectives based on stakeholders' values can result in consequences more aligned with stakeholders' expectations. Recent applications of SSM like Bernaola, et al (2020), Khayame & Abdeljawad (2020), de Lima Medeiros, Terra & Passador (2020), Sharma, et al (2019), Radfar, et al (2014 and Hanafizadeh & Ghamkhari (2019) focus effort in a few transformations (or in a single transformation) but they do not provide details about any other transformations that may be discarded.…”