2018
DOI: 10.4018/ij3dim.2018040101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Modelling of 3D Multi-Utility Networks for Urban Analyses and Simulations

Abstract: Current data models for representing, exchanging, and storing utility networks often meet the needs of specific domains only, i.e. they do not consider the integration of different network systems, mutual relations between networks and the embedding into 3D urban space. These important prerequisites for urban analyses and simulations are met by the CityGML extension Utility Network ADE. Originally developed for disaster management, this article presents the further development of the ADE by new and revised con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is realized by the three main parts: (1) the core thematic model with well-defined LoDs, classes, spatial and thematic attributes, and relations; (2) Gener-icCityObjects and generic attributes allow the extension of CityGML data on the fly; and (3) ADEs facilitate the systematic extension of the CityGML data model by new classes, attributes, and relations for specific application domains. Many ADEs have already been developed by different communities; for example, the Energy ADE (Nouvel et al 2015) to support energetic analyses of buildings or the Utility Network ADE (Kutzner et al 2018) supporting the simultaneous representation and analysis of multiple supply and disposal networks. A comprehensive discussion of existing CityGML ADEs is provided by Biljecki et al (2018).…”
Section: The International Standard Citygmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is realized by the three main parts: (1) the core thematic model with well-defined LoDs, classes, spatial and thematic attributes, and relations; (2) Gener-icCityObjects and generic attributes allow the extension of CityGML data on the fly; and (3) ADEs facilitate the systematic extension of the CityGML data model by new classes, attributes, and relations for specific application domains. Many ADEs have already been developed by different communities; for example, the Energy ADE (Nouvel et al 2015) to support energetic analyses of buildings or the Utility Network ADE (Kutzner et al 2018) supporting the simultaneous representation and analysis of multiple supply and disposal networks. A comprehensive discussion of existing CityGML ADEs is provided by Biljecki et al (2018).…”
Section: The International Standard Citygmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a literature review by Biljecki et al (2018), 44 ADEs currently exist that support not only different applications, such as the Utility Network ADE for representing multi-utility networks (Kutzner et al, 2018) and the Energy ADE for urban energy modelling (Nouvel et al, 2015), but also applicationindependent tasks, such as the IMGeo ADE that harmonizes CityGML with the Dutch National Spatial Data Infrastructure (Van den Brink et al, 2013). However, the literature review also shows that no ADEs exist to date that support sustainable urban development as intended by the municipalities in Japan.…”
Section: Citygml and Adementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olde Scholtenhuis et al [19] propose adding a fuzzy utility zone to the utility network application domain extension (ADE) [20]. This zone integrates precision information to the positioning of objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%