Semantic Models for the Geological Mapping Process

Abstract

Abstract. The geologic mapping process requires the organization of data according tothe general knowledge about the objects in the map, namely the geologic units, and tothe objectives of a graphic representation of such objects in a map, following some established model of geotectonic evolution. Semantics can greatly help such a process in providing a terminological base to name and classify the objects of the map and supporting the application of reasoning mechanisms for the derivation of novel properties and relations about the objects of the map.The OntoGeonous initiative has built a terminological base of geological knowledge in a machine-readable format, following the Semantic Web tenets and the Linked Data paradigm, with the construction of an appropriate data base schema that can be then filled with the objects of the map. The paper will present the conceptual model of the geologic system and how the elements of the cartographic database are classified from general definitions. Also, the paper addresses the setup of web-based services that respond to queries concerning the properties of the map elements that are not explicitly asserted in the underlying data base, but are inferred through a reasoning process.

Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects

“…The scarcity of available standardised lists of lithological types and geological structures can be overcome with the use of vocabularies such as GeoSciML (Geoscience Markup Language [102]). A semantic approach to data representation provides data interoperability on an international scale [103]. GeoSciML acts as an interchange language for geological information, provides a data model for harmonised geological maps, and is a global initiative with participants from four continents [104].…”

Tell Me Why: Computational Explanation of Conceptual Similarity Judgments

“…One chief feature for systems being proposed in these areas would be that of providing some sort of explanation on the ways their output was attained, so to both unveil the intermediate steps of the computation process and to justify the obtained results. Different kinds of explanation can be drawn, ranging from argumentation based approaches [23] to inferential processes triggered in formal ontologies categorisation [15]. Almost since its inception, explanation has involved expert systems and dialogue systems.…”