Oxford Handbooks Online 2016
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190228217.013.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Networks and Applications in Public Opinion Research

Abstract: Semantic networks represent and model messages and discourse as a relational structure, emphasizing patterns of interdependence among semantic units or actors-concepts. This chapter traces the epistemological roots of semantic networks, then illustrates with examples how this approach can contribute to the study of political rhetoric or opinions. It focuses on three levels of analysis: cognitive mapping at the individual level, discourse analysis at the interpersonal level, and framing and salience at the coll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once the topics are inferred, we construct topic overlap networks between actors (Shugars 2019; Yang and González-Bailón 2017). To build them, we calculate for each actor its use of topics or topic load , that is, on which topic they score high or low.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once the topics are inferred, we construct topic overlap networks between actors (Shugars 2019; Yang and González-Bailón 2017). To build them, we calculate for each actor its use of topics or topic load , that is, on which topic they score high or low.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4. Another comparison might be drawn to semantic network analysis (Rule et al 2015; Yang and González-Bailón, 2017). While both approaches rely on word co-occurrences, topics constitute latent dimensions that connect words in a bipartite network instead of unipartite ties in semantic network analysis (Griffiths et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic and socio‐semantic network analysis address many of the same types of questions that DNA addresses, but they are more general. Semantic network analysis focuses on relations between “semantic units” or concepts (concept‐concept networks), whereas socio‐semantic networks typically focus on the relationships between actors and concepts (actor‐concept networks), or between actors given what they express in speech or text (Yang & González‐Bailón, 2017, p. 327). The construction of these semantic and socio‐semantic networks relies on the close integration of network analysis with natural language processing (Basov et al., 2020; Bérubé et al., 2021; Fuhse et al., 2020; Graham et al., 2021; McLevey, 2022; Roth & Cointet, 2010).…”
Section: Non‐traditional Nodes and Bipartite/multi‐mode Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix in Figure is similar to a word/document matrix as used in library and information science (Salton & McGill, ) and also widely used in social network analysis (Borgatti & Everett, ) and recently also in semantic network analysis (for example, Yang & González‐Bailón, ). Figure shows the whole matrix containing the semantic network of actors and topics, and their relations in a single representation.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Network Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%