2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic patient information aggregation and medicinal decision support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…drug-target relations (Sun, 2015), drug-disease relations (Sun, 2015), disease-gene relations (Sun, 2015), and disease-disease risk relations (Xu, Li, & Wang, 2014). (Sun, 2015;Xu, Li, & Wang, 2014) have been developed for a variety of biomedical applications like biomedical question answering (Athenikos & Han, 2010), clinical decision support (De Potter, et al, 2012) and the automation of computed tomography procedures (De Silva, MacDonald, Paterson, Sikdar, & Cochrane, 2011). Some of these resources such as BabelMeSH and SNOMED-CT are currently available in multiple languages and can be used to process biomedical data provided in languages other than English (Liu, Fontelo, & Ackerman, 2006;Henriksson, Skeppstedt, Kvist, Duneld, & Conway, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…drug-target relations (Sun, 2015), drug-disease relations (Sun, 2015), disease-gene relations (Sun, 2015), and disease-disease risk relations (Xu, Li, & Wang, 2014). (Sun, 2015;Xu, Li, & Wang, 2014) have been developed for a variety of biomedical applications like biomedical question answering (Athenikos & Han, 2010), clinical decision support (De Potter, et al, 2012) and the automation of computed tomography procedures (De Silva, MacDonald, Paterson, Sikdar, & Cochrane, 2011). Some of these resources such as BabelMeSH and SNOMED-CT are currently available in multiple languages and can be used to process biomedical data provided in languages other than English (Liu, Fontelo, & Ackerman, 2006;Henriksson, Skeppstedt, Kvist, Duneld, & Conway, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the recent years, ontologies have been extensively used in biomedical domains [1] such as annotation of medical records [2], medical knowledge representation and sharing [3], clinical data integration and medical decision making [4]. The vast usage of ontologies in biomedical domain has compelled researchers to develop more biomedical ontologies such as gene ontology (GO) [5], National Cancer Institute (NCI) thesaurus [6], Foundation Model of Anatomy (FMA) [7] and the Systemised Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED‐CT) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies have gained much importance in the past two decades, especially in the biomedical domain. Various biomedical ontologies such as Gene Ontology (GO) [1], National Cancer Institute (NCI) Thesaurus [2], Foundation Model of Anatomy (FMA) [3], and Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED-CT) [4] have emerged and been maintained, which have been widely used in the medical records annotation [5], medical data formats standardization [6], medical or clinical knowledge representation and integration [7], and medical decision making [8]. Due to continuous evolution of biomedical data, biomedical ontologies are becoming larger and more complex, which leads to the existence of many overlapping information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%