2003
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: Evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
62
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
16
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we evaluated the distance effect by a regression analysis (see Gevers et al, in press). Many previous studies have shown the distance effect, which refers to the finding that RT decreases as numerical distance increases (e.g., Dehaene, 1989;Ito & Hatta, 2003;Marks, 1972;Moyer & Landauer, 1967). It has been considered that the distance effect depends on the quantitative representation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we evaluated the distance effect by a regression analysis (see Gevers et al, in press). Many previous studies have shown the distance effect, which refers to the finding that RT decreases as numerical distance increases (e.g., Dehaene, 1989;Ito & Hatta, 2003;Marks, 1972;Moyer & Landauer, 1967). It has been considered that the distance effect depends on the quantitative representation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between these two numeral systems raises the interesting question of how the mind represents different symbol formats. For example, it has been reported behaviorally that Arabic digits should have an advantage over number words in semantic tasks (Damian, 2004;Ito & Hatta, 2003). However, it is still unknown at what stage does this advantage occur?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the most robust finding in the field of numerical cognition is that Arabic digits can be processed faster than other types of numerals in semantic tasks (Cohen Kadosh et al, 2008;Damian, 2004;Dehaene & Akhavein, 1995;Henik & Tzelgov, 1982;Ito & Hatta, 2003). The effects of notation were taken to indicate faster access to numerical knowledge from Arabic digits, but slower access from other types of numerals.…”
Section: What Is Symbol Effect and Why?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size congruity effect has been consistently observed for the ideographic, Arabic numerals (Besner & Coltheart, 1979;Foltz et al, 1984;Henik & Tzelgov, 1982;Ito & Hatta, 2003;Vaid, 1985), but it has not always been found for number names (Besner & Coltheart, 1979;Vaid, 1985). Moreover, the differences between number formats were extended to the Japanese writing system, where the ideographic kanji script yielded a pattern similar to the one found for Arabic numerals, and the nonideographic kana script was processed similarly to English number names (Takahashi & Green, 1983; see also Ito & Hatta, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previous studies have suggested that these various visual formats are processed differently (Besner & Coltheart, 1979;Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993;Fias, Reynvoet, & Brysbaert, 2001;Foltz, Poltrock, & Potts, 1984;Ischebeck, 2003;Ito & Hatta, 2003;Takahashi & Green, 1983;Vaid, 1985). The present study explores further the processing pathways originating from different number notations by taking advantage of a unique number notation system that exists in Hebrew, which can provide further insights into the processes underlying numerical cognition and visual word recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%