2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic processing of highly repeated concepts presented in single-word trials: Electrophysiological and behavioral correlates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This opens a new avenue of research as the study of the variables that modulate the duration of N400 might reveal as much about the functional significance of this ERP as did the variables that modulate its amplitude. On the other hand, we have shown in previous studies that the amplitude of N400 recorded after multiple repetitions is sensitive to the same variables as in non-repeated conditions, namely semantic priming (across SOAs), semantic category and concreteness and that it is not modulated by physical matching (Debruille and Renoult, 2009;Renoult and Debruille, 2011;Renoult et al, 2010Renoult et al, , 2012. The present study confirmed the maintenance of semantic priming effects with repetition and demonstrated that these effects can be studied with various numbers of target words.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This opens a new avenue of research as the study of the variables that modulate the duration of N400 might reveal as much about the functional significance of this ERP as did the variables that modulate its amplitude. On the other hand, we have shown in previous studies that the amplitude of N400 recorded after multiple repetitions is sensitive to the same variables as in non-repeated conditions, namely semantic priming (across SOAs), semantic category and concreteness and that it is not modulated by physical matching (Debruille and Renoult, 2009;Renoult and Debruille, 2011;Renoult et al, 2010Renoult et al, , 2012. The present study confirmed the maintenance of semantic priming effects with repetition and demonstrated that these effects can be studied with various numbers of target words.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These early N400s were shown to be sensitive to the same variables as the N400s obtained in non-repeated conditions. Namely, they were modulated by semantic priming (across SOAs), semantic category and concreteness and were not affected by physical matching (Debruille and Renoult, 2009;Renoult and Debruille, 2011;Renoult et al, 2010Renoult et al, , 2012. Despite the observation that these N400s peaked much earlier for highly repeated words than non-repeated words, it could be demonstrated that the onset of the deflections themselves was the same in both conditions (around 230 ms after word onset; Debruille and Renoult, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the explicit semantic matching task, the main generators of the effect of semantic priming in the N400 time window were located in the left superior temporal gyrus and in the inferior parietal cortex bilaterally, as found in Renoult and Debruille (2011) and Renoult et al (2010). Differences in laterality were however present compared with these studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This was done because the classic 300-500 ms time window cannot be chosen to measure the N400-like potential observed with high rates of repetition as this deflection was shown to peak earlier than the classic N400 and to be temporally less extended (Debruille and Renoult, 2009;Renoult and Debruille, 2011;Renoult et al, 2010). The latency of the negative peak that appeared between 200 and 500 ms at Cz electrode on the grand average of unprimed trials was first measured.…”
Section: Data Processing and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%