2003
DOI: 10.1076/jcen.25.8.1070.16730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Relations and Repetition of Items Enhance the Free Recall of Words by Multiple Sclerosis Patients

Abstract: We compared 25 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 24 normal controls on a test of free recall of words. Some lists contained words that were all unrelated, while in others the intermediary words were semantically related. In another set, the mid-list words were repeated across the lists, or, in addition to the repetition, were semantically associated. Immediate recall was assessed using these lists. Delayed recall was assessed using different lists (delay-unrelated and delay-related) after distractor ta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the use of lists in which semantically related and unrelated items are included might help in the understanding of BDZ amnestic effects because in this case it is possible to assess the effects of these drugs on the activation of established relations between items. In order to make recall of related and non-related words comparable, we employed in the present study a paradigm used by several groups (Andrade et al, 2003;Craik and Levy, 1970;Tulving and Patterson, 1968) that consists of the introduction of semantically related words (e.g. milkcheese-butter) only in the middle positions of otherwise unrelated words lists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the use of lists in which semantically related and unrelated items are included might help in the understanding of BDZ amnestic effects because in this case it is possible to assess the effects of these drugs on the activation of established relations between items. In order to make recall of related and non-related words comparable, we employed in the present study a paradigm used by several groups (Andrade et al, 2003;Craik and Levy, 1970;Tulving and Patterson, 1968) that consists of the introduction of semantically related words (e.g. milkcheese-butter) only in the middle positions of otherwise unrelated words lists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderate AD patients, however, did not get any profit from this association. A comparison can be made with other patients that also suffer from an impairment of memory but due to other etiologies, as is the case of multiple sclerosis patients in which both semantically related words and repetition of midlist words across several lists, enhance free recall of the target words 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primacy effect reflects an aspect of long-term memory, possibly resulting from a prolonged processing of the first words in the list when compared to those in the middle 9 , the recency effect, on the other hand, can be supported by short-term memory 10 . The introduction of semantically related words alters the pattern of the serial position curve, producing peaks of high recollection of these words 11,12 . repetition of words in the middle of the lists also causes another peak of recollection of these repeated words 11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Para realização deste teste, o idoso foi colocado em uma sala reservada, sendo orientado a prestar atenção na lista de palavras que o pesquisador iria ler. O idoso foi orientado a memorizar o máximo de palavras possíveis e a ordem em que as mesmas foram citadas.…”
Section: Teste De Recordação Imediata E Tardia Deunclassified