1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80008-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic satiation as a function of duration of repetition and initial meaning intensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Jakobovits and Rice (see Footnote 2) were contrary to the Yelen and Schulz's hypothesis, but at least two of Jakobovits and Rice's variables were confounded, and this confounding could also account for their results. The results of Kasschau (1969) further confused the issue since part of his results were consistent with the regression hypothesis, and part were not. Until such time as positive results can be consistently and unequivocally obtained, controlling all appropriate factors, the semantic differential method of measuring semantic satiation is extremely suspect.…”
Section: Semantic Differentialmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of Jakobovits and Rice (see Footnote 2) were contrary to the Yelen and Schulz's hypothesis, but at least two of Jakobovits and Rice's variables were confounded, and this confounding could also account for their results. The results of Kasschau (1969) further confused the issue since part of his results were consistent with the regression hypothesis, and part were not. Until such time as positive results can be consistently and unequivocally obtained, controlling all appropriate factors, the semantic differential method of measuring semantic satiation is extremely suspect.…”
Section: Semantic Differentialmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a subsequent study, Kasschau (1969) tested three levels of initial meaning intensity (2.5, 1.5, and 0.5 units away from the midpoint of semantic differential scales), three semantic differential factors (Evaluative, Potency, and Activity), and seven levels of repetition duration (0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 120 seconds) in a pre-and postrepetition rating design. Both mean difference scores and polarity difference scores were computed.…”
Section: Semantic Differentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedures in practice and formal experiments were the same (see Figure 1). Firstly, a word was displayed for 25 s (Kasschau, 1969). To keep the participant’s attention focusing on the word, they were required to press the space key as soon as the word randomly flicked twice during its presentation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procedures in practice and formal experiments were the same (see Figure 1). Firstly, a word was displayed for 25 s (Kasschau, 1969).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pacing for the repetition was provided by a Hunter timer, which activated a speaker connected to a Selmer electronic metronome set to click twice per second. The apparatus for presenting the word to be repeated and the scales on which subsequently to rate the repeated word were as described by Kasschau (1969).…”
Section: Materials and Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%