IGARSS 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2019
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2019.8898742
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Segmentation of Underwater Sonar Imagery with Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note especially that in the lowest training data scenario of five images, IDSS provides the largest improvement (0.128 MPA) over the second best method. Note also that Rahnemoonfar, et al [29] does not perform particularly well on our SAS dataset. We conjecture this for a couple of reasons: 1.)…”
Section: E Computational Burdenmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note especially that in the lowest training data scenario of five images, IDSS provides the largest improvement (0.128 MPA) over the second best method. Note also that Rahnemoonfar, et al [29] does not perform particularly well on our SAS dataset. We conjecture this for a couple of reasons: 1.)…”
Section: E Computational Burdenmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…There has been recent work in deep-networks [29], [30] trained for sidescan sonar images to segment seabed environment textures. These models are trained in a purely supervised fashion (using tedious human annotation), with training and evaluation over a relatively homogeneous image collection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advancement of AI techniques in recent years has had a great impact on our approaches to data analysis. Deep learning, in particular, has shown great success in many areas of practical interest such as classification (Krizhevsky and others, 2012a;Szegedy and others, 2015a;Sheppard and Rahnemoonfar, 2017), object recognition (Girshick and others, 2014;Hariharan and others, 2014), counting Sheppard, 2017a, 2017;Rahnemoonfar and others, 2019a) and semantic segmentation (Farabet and others, 2013;Mostajabi and others, 2015;Rahnemoonfar and others, 2018;Rahnemoonfar and Dobbs, 2019). Despite their progress, these algorithms are limited mainly to optical imagery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%