2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000185013.98821.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic sentence processing reflected in the event-related potentials of one- and two-year-old children

Abstract: This study investigates by means of the event-related brain potential whether mechanisms of lexical priming and semantic integration are already developed in 14 -month-olds. While looking at coloured pictures of known objects children were presented with basic-level words that were either congruous or incongruous to the pictures.The event-related potential of14 -month-olds revealed an early negativity in the lateral frontal brain region for congruous words, and a later N400 -like negativity for incongruous wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
46
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
46
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The latency of the infants' response, however, is delayed as compared with prior findings in adults. The delayed onset of ERP components is not unexpected, given that delayed onsets of ERP components in early infancy have also been observed for the processing of semantic [19] and syntactic information [20]. The present finding supports the view that prosodic processes crucial for speech segmentation are established very early in development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The latency of the infants' response, however, is delayed as compared with prior findings in adults. The delayed onset of ERP components is not unexpected, given that delayed onsets of ERP components in early infancy have also been observed for the processing of semantic [19] and syntactic information [20]. The present finding supports the view that prosodic processes crucial for speech segmentation are established very early in development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The former changes are suggested in particular by longer latencies of waveform components in children's ERPs. Such shifts have been reported on both early ERP components associated with auditory or visual perception (e.g., at P50 and P100 peaks for auditory and visual stimuli respectively, Holcomb et al, 1992) and on later components associated with language processing (prolonged N400 in a semantic task in Friedrich and Friederici, 2005; shifted component at 300-550 ms in the verb conjugation task in Budd et al, 2013). Given that these results focused on specific ERP components in various experimental paradigms and ages, it is not possible to conclude whether only specific word planning processes speed up from childhood to adulthood or if the increases in processing speed are distributed across all processing stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a typical developmental thread, it was observed that 12-month-old children who have a high vocabulary production showed the N400 effect with a delay in the latency and decreased duration of the wave when compared to the one observed in older children and adults 5 ; at 19 and 24 months old incoherent stimuli caused a bigger range that started at the same time it does in adults, however, with extended effect in both age groups 22,23,25 ; at 20 months old, children with low and high vocabulary production differed in the mapping performance of new words but not for real words 28 ; at 30 months old 24 and from 3 to 6 years old 2,16 , children showed a negative effect for semantically anomalous words, similar to the patterns reported in older children and adults.…”
Section: The N400 Effect On Preschool Children Showing a Typical Devementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, in order to investigate the semantic processing in children aged 19 and 24 months old, they used a paradigm of hearing sentences with coherent and incoherent endings at random 23 . At 24 months old, there was an increased negativity (i.e., broader range) for incoherent stimuli and with centerparietal distribution; and at 19 months old, there was a similar response however with a broader distribution through the scalp.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%