2012 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Semantic Computing 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icsc.2012.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic Tags for Lecture Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imran and Cheikh (2012) first proposed the multimedia learning object framework for video lectures that opened up the niche for utilizing both implicit and explicit metadata obtained from textual content and non-textual cues for content organizing, structuring, and classification of video learning objects. A number of classification approaches as a result with respect to lecture videos have evolved over the years, most of which make use of natural language processing (NLP) either directly on the accompanying audio transcript as in (Imran et al, 2012b), or extracted automatically from the lecture images employing OCR as in (Imran et al, 2012a) or via speech-to-text such as in (Dessì et al, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imran and Cheikh (2012) first proposed the multimedia learning object framework for video lectures that opened up the niche for utilizing both implicit and explicit metadata obtained from textual content and non-textual cues for content organizing, structuring, and classification of video learning objects. A number of classification approaches as a result with respect to lecture videos have evolved over the years, most of which make use of natural language processing (NLP) either directly on the accompanying audio transcript as in (Imran et al, 2012b), or extracted automatically from the lecture images employing OCR as in (Imran et al, 2012a) or via speech-to-text such as in (Dessì et al, 2018).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the accuracy between the text and the tags, computed by the semantic distance, was correlated 6 with the results in multiple choice questions tests. A similar approach with Wordnet was carried out by Imran et al [16] in order to tag lecture videos from the transcripts. In this case semantic distance was computed to perform sense disambiguation process.…”
Section: Concept Maps In Visual Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Implicit" is automatic meta-data generation: meta-data that is not created deliberately by users, but either generated and assigned as static meta-data, or generated on the fly, by software, applying intelligent analysis to objects of all types (text, images, audio, video, etc.). In case of our MLO Framework, we developed such a tool to analyze a text and assign "semantic tags" also known as "keywords" to LO based on the content and context of this text, even if the words do not appear in the text at all [14]. It would also discard texts referring to something completely different.…”
Section: A Media Analysis and Processing Unit (Mapu)mentioning
confidence: 99%