2018
DOI: 10.3233/sw-180321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic technologies and interoperability in the built environment

Abstract: The built environment consists of plenty of physical assets with which we interact on a daily basis. In order to improve not only our built environment, but also our interaction with that environment, we would benefit a lot from semantic representations of this environment. This not only includes buildings, but also large infrastructure (bridges, tunnels, waterways, underground systems), and geospatial data. With this special issue, an insight is given into the current state of the art in terms of semantic tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the limitations of ifcOWL is that some of its modelling specifications are inconsistent with the Semantic Web best practices, like the definition of boolean and relations. The current condition of ifcOWL encompasses some syntactic structures that originate from the EXPRESS schema, making the ifcOWL ontology like the IFC data model complex, hard to understand, and inefficient in reasoning (Pauwels, Poveda-Villalón, Sicilia, & Euzenat, 2018;Schneider, Rasmussen, Bonsma, Oraskari, & Pauwels, 2018). The size of ifcOWL could be another limitation of this schema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the limitations of ifcOWL is that some of its modelling specifications are inconsistent with the Semantic Web best practices, like the definition of boolean and relations. The current condition of ifcOWL encompasses some syntactic structures that originate from the EXPRESS schema, making the ifcOWL ontology like the IFC data model complex, hard to understand, and inefficient in reasoning (Pauwels, Poveda-Villalón, Sicilia, & Euzenat, 2018;Schneider, Rasmussen, Bonsma, Oraskari, & Pauwels, 2018). The size of ifcOWL could be another limitation of this schema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the AEC industry, the use of semantic web technologies in the form of ontology development has increased over the years (Pauwels et al, 2018). Ontological studies have focussed on mapping knowledge discretely during the design, construction, and operational phase of an infrastructure's lifecycle.…”
Section: Ontologies For An Infrastructure's Lifecyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the open-exchange IFC format is increasingly mandatory for publicly supported construction projects in several countries. Unfortunately there are clear limitations in the IFC [55], [56], [57], [58], [59], [60], meaning that BIM struggles to connect and retrieve all the desired data. IFC data often lack the flexibility required in unique and unconventional work processes [55], [59].…”
Section: A Ifc and Bim Exchange Formatsmentioning
confidence: 99%