2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-43887-6_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantically Corroborating Neural Attention for Biomedical Question Answering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 7, we randomly sample such cases. Due to the lack of space, we provide more examples of cases at our url 5 . In here, we use the extractive QA setting to measure the upper-bound performance of our method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Table 7, we randomly sample such cases. Due to the lack of space, we provide more examples of cases at our url 5 . In here, we use the extractive QA setting to measure the upper-bound performance of our method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we compare our results with the best results from last year's BioASQ Challenge Task 7B (Phase B)[5][6][7]14,29,36]. From this comparison, we observe that training BioBERT on the MNLI dataset significantly improves its performance on the Yes/No (+5.59%), Factoid (+0.53%), and List (+13.58%) type questions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The "BIOASQ VK " systems were based on BioBERT [26], but with novel modifications to allow the model to cope with yes/no, factoid and list questions [41]. They pre-trained the model on the SQUAD dataset (for factoid and list questions) and SQUAD2 (for yes/no questions) to leverage the small size of the BioASQ dataset and by exploiting different pre-/post-processing techniques they obtained great results on all subtasks.…”
Section: Task 7bmentioning
confidence: 99%