2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cag.2011.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantics by analogy for illustrative volume visualization

Abstract: We present an interactive graphical approach for the explicit specification of semantics for volume visualization. This explicit and graphical specification of semantics for volumetric features allows us to visually assign meaning to both input and output parameters of the visualization mapping. This is in contrast to the implicit way of specifying semantics using transfer functions. In particular, we demonstrate how to realize a dynamic specification of semantics which allows to flexibly explore a wide range … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, semantic specifications for particular visualization aspects such as the user domain data classification, the visual representation, and the visual mapping were developed. Some examples include size-based data classifications [24,25], a taxonomy for visualization algorithms that was based on assumptions over their inputs [26], the characterization of visual variables to represent visual representations at a higher level of abstraction [27], the use of fuzzy logic semantics to replace the traditional transfer function setup in illustrative volume rendering [28,29], and a specific semantic model created by a machine learning mechanism that used representative dataset collections as training sets [30].…”
Section: Previous Work On Semantics and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, semantic specifications for particular visualization aspects such as the user domain data classification, the visual representation, and the visual mapping were developed. Some examples include size-based data classifications [24,25], a taxonomy for visualization algorithms that was based on assumptions over their inputs [26], the characterization of visual variables to represent visual representations at a higher level of abstraction [27], the use of fuzzy logic semantics to replace the traditional transfer function setup in illustrative volume rendering [28,29], and a specific semantic model created by a machine learning mechanism that used representative dataset collections as training sets [30].…”
Section: Previous Work On Semantics and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo et al [11] developed a sketch-based approach for volume rendering manipulation, allowing for quick and easy adjustment of properties such as such as color, transparency, contrast, or brightness. Gerl et al [10] proposed an interactive approach for the explicit specification of semantics in volume visualization, to visually assign meaning to both input and output parameters of the visualization mapping.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is halos [ARS79, SGS05, TCM06, EBRI09] that make objects (including lines) easier to discern from the background, thus improving depth perception. The second is the use of transfer functions, well known from volume rendering [KKH02], to display multiple styles in one visualization, e. g., as used for volumetric style transfer functions [BG07,GRIG12]. In the context of flow visualization [BCP * 12], other illustrative methods related to our work include stroke-and painting-inspired visualizations of 2D flow fields [KML99, LHS08], illustrative 3D volume rendering [SJEG05], stylized streamlines [MTHG03,LS07,LGP12], textured streamlines [JZDL07], animated, dashed streamlines [LH05] and dashtubes [FG98], as well as illustrative stream ribbons and surfaces [BWF * 10, HGH * 10, CYY * 11].…”
Section: Illustrative Visualization and Line Stylizationmentioning
confidence: 99%