2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-014-2309-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantics discovery in social tagging systems: A review

Abstract: Web 2.0 has brought many collaborative and novel applications which transformed the web as a medium and resulted in its exponential growth. Tagging systems are one of these killer applications. Tags are in free-form but represent the link between objective information and users' cognitive information. However, tags have ambiguity problem reducing precision. Hence search and retrieval pose a challenge on folksonomy systems which have flat, unstructured, non-hierarchical organization with unsupervised vocabulary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, Xie et al [42] extract communities of similar users from their tagging profiles to enrich future tag suggestions. Jabeen et al [22] provide a comprehensive review of approaches to extracting semantics from social tagging datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Xie et al [42] extract communities of similar users from their tagging profiles to enrich future tag suggestions. Jabeen et al [22] provide a comprehensive review of approaches to extracting semantics from social tagging datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has been done to introduce semantics in folksonomy [16][17][18][19], and to investigate methods of deploying this semantics for tasks such as information retrieval [20][21][22], recommender systems [23][24][25][26], and ontologies development [27][28][29]. As well, quite a number of works has been done to extract structured knowledge and develop ontologies from social tagging systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Gupta et al [2010] discusses papers on why people tag, what influences the choice of tags, and how to model the tagging process, but its discussion on content-based image tagging is limited. The focus of Jabeen et al [2016] is on papers about adding semantics to tags by exploiting varied knowledge sources such as Wikipedia, DBpedia, and WordNet. Again, it leaves the visual information untouched.…”
Section: Scope Aims and Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%