2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semen quality and age-specific changes: a study between two decades on 3,729 male partners of couples with normal sperm count and attending an andrology laboratory for infertility-related problems in an Indian city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
46
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
46
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have reported concerns that infertility rates and the sperm quality of men may be increasing worldwide [3,4]. Common problems of male subfertility or infertility include oligozoospermia, azoospermia, asthenozoospermia, teratozoospermia, and any combination of these problems [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported concerns that infertility rates and the sperm quality of men may be increasing worldwide [3,4]. Common problems of male subfertility or infertility include oligozoospermia, azoospermia, asthenozoospermia, teratozoospermia, and any combination of these problems [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] By contrast, other studies have shown no evidence of deteriorating semen quality. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Some studies concern infertile couples, while others analyse normal sperm parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approval for this study was obtained from the French institutional review board, the CNIL (National Board of Data Processing and Liberties n 0 909493) Statistical analyses were performed on the first sperm sample for each patient. We also performed statistical analyses on selected samples having a total normal sperm count (o40 million/ejaculate) according to the results obtained by Mukhopdayay et al 8 and Spirada et al 6 This corresponded to 7899 semen samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controversies include the following: [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] However, there have been many more studies (with many more total subjects enrolled) that show no change or even increased sperm counts. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] The potential explanations for the variable results in these studies include selection bias of the volunteer subjects, methodological problems with obtaining samples of geographical heterogeneity, variability in age and health, and potential environmental confounders. 37 Selection bias of volunteer subjects is likely to contribute to significant variability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%