2002
DOI: 10.4310/hha.2002.v4.n1.a10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-abelian exact completions

Abstract: We characterize the categories which are projective covers of regular protomodular categories. Our result gives in particular a characterization of the categories with weak finite limits with the property that their exact completions are semi-abelian categories. As an application, we obtain a categorical proof of the recent characterization of semi-abelian varieties.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to observe that, unlike normality, protomodularity has the same behaviour with respect to the regular and the exact completions. This is due to the fact that the condition used in [9] for P implies protomodularity of C already when P is merely a projective cover of C. Note, however, that unlike in the present case, the condition used in [9] for P does not imply the same condition on C. Moreover, protomodularity of P does not imply, in general, protomodularity of its regular completion. For instance, the regular completion of the protomodular category of groups is not a protomodular category (while it is still normal by Corollary 4.2).…”
Section: The Pointed Contextmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting to observe that, unlike normality, protomodularity has the same behaviour with respect to the regular and the exact completions. This is due to the fact that the condition used in [9] for P implies protomodularity of C already when P is merely a projective cover of C. Note, however, that unlike in the present case, the condition used in [9] for P does not imply the same condition on C. Moreover, protomodularity of P does not imply, in general, protomodularity of its regular completion. For instance, the regular completion of the protomodular category of groups is not a protomodular category (while it is still normal by Corollary 4.2).…”
Section: The Pointed Contextmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Similar questions were studied in [9] with respect to protomodular categories [1] in the place of normal categories. It is interesting to observe that, unlike normality, protomodularity has the same behaviour with respect to the regular and the exact completions.…”
Section: The Pointed Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for binary coproducts, an argument which appeared in [23] can be adapted to our purposes. Any two objects of X ex/reg can be presented as coequalizers of equivalence relations Observe that, in the protomodular context, giving a coequalizer of an equivalence relation is equivalent to giving a cokernel of the corresponding Bourn-normal monomorphism.…”
Section: The Semi-abelian Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having this link in mind, our main interest in studying this subject is to characterize projective covers of certain algebraic categories through simpler properties involving projectives and to relate those properties to the known varietal characterizations in terms of the existence of operations of their varietal theories (when it is the case). Such kind of studies have been done for the projective covers of categories which are: Mal'tsev [11], protomodular and semi-abelian [5], (strongly) unital and subtractive [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%