2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21880.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-analytic galaxy formation in early dark energy cosmologies

Abstract: We study the impact of early dark energy (EDE) cosmologies on galaxy properties by coupling high-resolution numerical simulations with semi-analytic modeling (SAM) of galaxy formation and evolution. EDE models are characterized by a non-vanishing high-redshift contribution of dark energy, producing an earlier growth of structures and a modification of large-scale structure evolution. They can be viewed as typical representatives of non-standard dark energy models in which only the expansion history is modified… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in terms of structure formation, the WMAP5 cosmology chosen for the Bolshoi (Klypin et al 2011) and Multi-Dark (Prada et al 2012) simulations differs from the currently preferred Planck cosmology by twice as much as the original WMAP1 cosmology of the Millennium Simulations in terms of the scaling required (∼ 9% in box size and ∼ 29% in particle mass compared to ∼ 4% in box size and ∼ 17% in particle mass), but only by half as much in terms of the time offset (∆z = 0.07 rather than ∆z = 0.12). However, as shown by Wang et al (2008), and Fontanot et al (2012), the differences in cosmological parameters between all these modern determinations have a much smaller effect on galaxy properties than the uncertainties in galaxy formation physics. As a result, the change in cosmology has little impact in our conclusions.…”
Section: Simulations and Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in terms of structure formation, the WMAP5 cosmology chosen for the Bolshoi (Klypin et al 2011) and Multi-Dark (Prada et al 2012) simulations differs from the currently preferred Planck cosmology by twice as much as the original WMAP1 cosmology of the Millennium Simulations in terms of the scaling required (∼ 9% in box size and ∼ 29% in particle mass compared to ∼ 4% in box size and ∼ 17% in particle mass), but only by half as much in terms of the time offset (∆z = 0.07 rather than ∆z = 0.12). However, as shown by Wang et al (2008), and Fontanot et al (2012), the differences in cosmological parameters between all these modern determinations have a much smaller effect on galaxy properties than the uncertainties in galaxy formation physics. As a result, the change in cosmology has little impact in our conclusions.…”
Section: Simulations and Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Red circles mark the position of galaxy overdensities from Salimbeni et al (2009) who used a smoothed 3D density technique from the GOODS-MUSIC catalogue to search for overdensities (the size of the circle is arbitrary and fixed). Fontanot et al 2012;Guo et al 2013a).…”
Section: The Model Galaxy Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDE models can potentially alleviate the coincidence problem. Furthermore, they can influence the cosmic microwave background [3][4][5][6][7][8][9], big-bang nucleosynthesis [10] and large-scale structure formation [11][12][13][14][17][18][19]. For now, it would be fair to say that there are no strong observational constraints on the EDE models, and it is especially difficult to discriminate EDE models which have w = −1 at present from the ΛCDM model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EDE model described in (1) has been confronted to the type Ia supernova test including samples at z > 1.25 [15] [16]. The impact of this EDE cosmology on galaxy properties has been studied by coupling high-resolution numerical simulations with semi-analytic modeling of galaxy formation and evolution [13]. The available results highlight that such EDE model leads to important modifications in the galaxy properties with respect to a standard ΛCDM universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%