1999
DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Analytical Approach to the Non-Linear Dynamic Response Problem of S–s and C–c Beams at Large Vibration Amplitudes Part I: General Theory and Application to the Single Mode Approach to Free and Forced Vibration Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The top surface of the FG beam is ceramic rich (E c =322.03 GPa, ρ c =2370 Kg/m 3 ), whereas the bottom surface of the FG beam is metal rich (E m =207.08 GPa, ρ m =8166 Kg/m 3 ). In table 1, It is noted that the first nonlinear frequency ratios ω nl /ω l , calculated in the present work at various vibration amplitudes in the case of an isotropic clampedclamped beam, agree very well with the results obtained in [8], since the percentage error does not exceed 0.3%. However, the solutions given in [7] overestimate the frequencies of the clamped beams, especially for high values of dimensionless amplitude.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The top surface of the FG beam is ceramic rich (E c =322.03 GPa, ρ c =2370 Kg/m 3 ), whereas the bottom surface of the FG beam is metal rich (E m =207.08 GPa, ρ m =8166 Kg/m 3 ). In table 1, It is noted that the first nonlinear frequency ratios ω nl /ω l , calculated in the present work at various vibration amplitudes in the case of an isotropic clampedclamped beam, agree very well with the results obtained in [8], since the percentage error does not exceed 0.3%. However, the solutions given in [7] overestimate the frequencies of the clamped beams, especially for high values of dimensionless amplitude.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Expression (10) for the total strain energy is effective for replacing the FGM beam problem with an equivalent classical isotropic beam problem [8]. The kinetic energy, in which the axial and rotary inertia are ignored, is given by:…”
Section: Non Linear Free Vibration Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of the present paper is to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method by applying to the large amplitude free vibrations of a uniform, shear flexible hinged-hinged and clamped-clamped beams in conjunction with the coupled displacement theory and the principle of conservation of total energy. The results are obtained in closed form expressions of the non-linear to linear radian frequency ratios for simply supported and clamped beams at various modes for various slenderness and maximum amplitude ratios, and are obtained using the harmonic balance method [10]. Comparison of the present results with those existing in literature for the first mode for shear flexible beams shows that the present results obtained from the concept of coupled displacement field analysis are accurate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Using the Harmonic balance method (HBM) [10] as discussed in the next section can solve equation (23). …”
Section: Large Amplitude Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beams are also used to model rotating blades dynamics, for example blades of a helicopter rotor [4,5] or blades of turbines. Many authors use the classical FEM [6,7] and semi-analytical methods [8,9] to study this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%