1971
DOI: 10.1016/0029-554x(71)90587-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-analytical calculations for circular quadrupoles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 3 and 4 suggest an optimum value near r = 1.125 × r 0 rather than the previous suggestions2,, 3,, 6,, 7 of around r = 1.146 × r 0 . Also the curves suggest the effect of varying r/r 0 is more pronounced at higher resolution settings.…”
Section: Rod Sizecontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figures 3 and 4 suggest an optimum value near r = 1.125 × r 0 rather than the previous suggestions2,, 3,, 6,, 7 of around r = 1.146 × r 0 . Also the curves suggest the effect of varying r/r 0 is more pronounced at higher resolution settings.…”
Section: Rod Sizecontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…An analysis6 for the identical case of an ideal magnetic quadrupole system determined a marginally different value for the 12‐pole term to be zero giving an optimum condition of r = 1.14511 × r 0 . A more recent analysis7 is similar to this6 (the authors appear to not have been aware of the earlier work), and again the work suggests the optimum condition occurs for r = 1.14511 × r 0 . Many commercial QMS instruments use values of r/r 0 found experimentally.…”
Section: Rod Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dayton et al . proposed 1.148, Denison 1.1468, Lee‐Whiting and Yamazaki, and later Reuben et al ., 1.14511. However, the ratio that makes A 6 = 0 is not optimum for a quadrupole mass filter operated conventionally with mass analysis at the tip of the first stability diagram.…”
Section: Values Of Qdβ/dqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a circular rod quadrupole system, the configuration is usually described by the ratio r / r 0 , where r is the radius of the circular rod electrodes and r 0 is the radius of the electrical field. After Lee‐Whiting and Yamakazi,11 Reuban et al 12. calculated the electrostatic field distribution of a multi‐electrode system that contains an even number of parallel cylindrical rods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%