2021
DOI: 10.1002/nme.6771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi‐analytical smoothed‐particle hydrodynamics correction factors for polynomial kernels and piecewise‐planar boundaries

Abstract: This work presents a method of exactly and efficiently evaluating integrals of compactly supported (and otherwise) polynomial radial kernels near piecewise-planar boundaries. The technique is motivated by and has an immediate application in the smoothed-particle hydrodynamics method employing the semi-analytical boundary formulation. The current implementation is exact and fully general, avoiding any need for symbolic or numerical integration which previous implementations rely on. A detailed derivation and th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Boundary walls represented by a scalar field with discrete signed distance functions (SDF) [28], aiming to improve the efficiency in calculate the distances between the particles and mesh. • Accuracy improvement of the polygon wall formalism by adopting numerical boundary integrations [29], semi-analytical boundary integrations [30] or analytical volume integrations [31]. • Inclusion of multi-resolution techniques (see Table 1 in [32]) should also be evaluated with respect to adaptivity and versatility of our code.…”
Section: Future Improvements Of the Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Boundary walls represented by a scalar field with discrete signed distance functions (SDF) [28], aiming to improve the efficiency in calculate the distances between the particles and mesh. • Accuracy improvement of the polygon wall formalism by adopting numerical boundary integrations [29], semi-analytical boundary integrations [30] or analytical volume integrations [31]. • Inclusion of multi-resolution techniques (see Table 1 in [32]) should also be evaluated with respect to adaptivity and versatility of our code.…”
Section: Future Improvements Of the Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method enhances the SPH and allows the definition of the boundary condition directly. In other work, 26 a semi‐analytical boundary formulation was proposed, which can evaluate the exact integrals of compactly support polynomial radial kernels near piecewise‐planar boundaries efficiently. A strategy to preserve the energy in a consistent basis function was proposed, in which the correction term at every interaction pair is implemented to achieve local energy conservation 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%