2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2015.7178500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-asynchronous routing for large scale hierarchical networks

Abstract: We consider the distributed network routing problem in a large-scale hierarchical network whereby the nodes are partitioned into subnet works. each managed by a network controller (NC). and there is a central NC to coordinate the operation of the distributed NCs. We propose a semi-asynchronous routing algorithm for such a network. whereby the computation is distributed across the NCs and is parallel within each Ne. A key feature of the algorithm is its ability to han dle a certain degree of asynchronism: the d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this task is difficult because the optimization variables of problem (32) is coupled (indeed each flow rate f m appears in exactly two flow conservation constraints). To address this problem, we introduce a few sets of new variables to decouple the flow conservation constraints across different subnetworks (we refer the readers to [95] for the detailed reformulation). The reformulated problem (32) is given by…”
Section: B Coupling Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this task is difficult because the optimization variables of problem (32) is coupled (indeed each flow rate f m appears in exactly two flow conservation constraints). To address this problem, we introduce a few sets of new variables to decouple the flow conservation constraints across different subnetworks (we refer the readers to [95] for the detailed reformulation). The reformulated problem (32) is given by…”
Section: B Coupling Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wireline network consists of 5 subnetworks. Each of them is controlled by a NC, and these NCs are coordinated globally by a central NC 0[95].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent work has derived an improvement for the distributed mechanism proposed in [8], which uses a standard gradient projection method for the decomposition approach, by employing alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) in order to obtain faster and more robust computation. See, e.g., [21]. It however requires substantial communication overhead, i.e., besides requiring each agent to know the cost and benefit of all possible choices, the agents need to know their share of unallocated capacity at each connected grid [22].…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As proposed in [17] and [31], we combine a dual decomposition approach with the gradient projection method to decouple problem (21). The feasibility and stability of the distributed MPC approach have been studied in [17] and [31] as well.…”
Section: B Distributed Mpc Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate here is w.r.t the minimization variable x; 2 Note that this algorithm has nested loops, so the total number of iterations are counted;3 The two results refer to the case where F is strongly concave and concave, respectively, w.r.t y.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%