2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automated 3-dimensional analysis of the normal foot and ankle using weight bearing CT – A report of normal values and bony relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,20 Although significantly improved from the preoperative state, the hindfoot axial parameters remained significantly different from normative values. 22 In our study, we achieved improvement of coronal varus deformity in the hindfoot, as exhibited by the significant correction of 22.1 degrees in the Saltzman view angle. Our CMT deformity patients averaged 11.0 degrees of varus preoperatively, corrected to 11.1 degrees of valgus postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4,20 Although significantly improved from the preoperative state, the hindfoot axial parameters remained significantly different from normative values. 22 In our study, we achieved improvement of coronal varus deformity in the hindfoot, as exhibited by the significant correction of 22.1 degrees in the Saltzman view angle. Our CMT deformity patients averaged 11.0 degrees of varus preoperatively, corrected to 11.1 degrees of valgus postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Angles between bone axes were automatically measured and collected by the software as previously described. 22 For the analysis of hindfoot sagittal alignment, sagittal Meary angle and calcaneal inclination angle (ie, calcaneal pitch angle) were evaluated. To investigate hindfoot axial and coronal alignment, axial talonavicular angle (TNA), axial Meary angle, talar tilt, and Saltzman view angle 17,22 were measured.…”
Section: Wbct Analysis Using 3d Semiautomated Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[3, 22] The recent advent of weightbearing cone‐beam CT (WBCT) overcomes these drawbacks by imaging both ankles during bipedal loading [2, 7, 25]. Software‐based techniques, utilized to generate models of bones and calculate their axes within a three‐dimensional framework, have previously demonstrated high efficacy and accuracy in assessing the spatial orientation and detecting landmarks of ankle bones [28, 37]. Despite these technological advances, it remains debated whether syndesmotic ankle injuries should be imaged under weightbearing conditions and/or during application of external rotation [6, 19, 31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%