2017 IEEE 3rd International Forum on Research and Technologies for Society and Industry (RTSI) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/rtsi.2017.8065898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automated estimation of the local flood depth on SAR images

Abstract: In the context of a flooding, a clear cloud-free SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) image proves mainly useful to retrieve flood features that can provide an extensive understanding of the disaster. Among these features, extremely important is the water depth on which this paper will focus by looking for a semi-automated algorithm for its estimation in the neighborhood of a given building from a pair of SAR images.In this study, two SAR images acquired during dry and flooded conditions are necessary, as well as a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among future improvements, one preprocessing step required to precede the classification is the generation of a mask of shadows from the DEM, which represents areas where the flood cannot be detected on the SAR image, because the presence of water there does not affect the backscatter [12]. Also as a future work, the algorithm developed in [13] to give an Table 3. The commission and omission errors for the flood and non-flood classes and the overall accuracy of the classification with the SGD classifier on Tewkesbury 2007 dataset [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among future improvements, one preprocessing step required to precede the classification is the generation of a mask of shadows from the DEM, which represents areas where the flood cannot be detected on the SAR image, because the presence of water there does not affect the backscatter [12]. Also as a future work, the algorithm developed in [13] to give an Table 3. The commission and omission errors for the flood and non-flood classes and the overall accuracy of the classification with the SGD classifier on Tewkesbury 2007 dataset [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%