2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-54045-0_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-automatic Software Feature-Relevant Information Extraction from Natural Language User Manuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other works address similar problems in the software engineering research area [62,204,261], in the agricultural regulation domain [77], and -up to some extent -in the digital forensics field [258], but the results are far from being applicable to complex, unstructured, heterogeneous standard specifications.…”
Section: Certifying Systems Against Textual Descriptions and System Runsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works address similar problems in the software engineering research area [62,204,261], in the agricultural regulation domain [77], and -up to some extent -in the digital forensics field [258], but the results are far from being applicable to complex, unstructured, heterogeneous standard specifications.…”
Section: Certifying Systems Against Textual Descriptions and System Runsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works address similar problems in the software engineering research area [56,187,237], in the agricultural regulation domain [68], and -up to some extent -in the digital forensics field [234], but the results are far from being applicable to complex, unstructured, heterogeneous standard specifications.…”
Section: Certifying Systems Against Textual Descriptions and System Runsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, devising a complete set of generalizable criteria for distinguishing superfluous and relevant domain model elements is difficult, if not infeasible. Queries and heuristics, e.g., as employed by Rago et al [2016] and Quirchmayr et al [2017], can be helpful for specific domains and document types; however, these approaches cannot adapt themselves to the reasoning applied by experts in a domain that has not been studied a priori. In contrast, our approach, which builds on ML, can mimic the logic applied by experts in any domain, without the need for this logic to be made explicit and articulated.…”
Section: Conclusion Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%