2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2007.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-blind algorithms for automatic classification of digital modulation schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark: For the time being, we assume that A, σ 2 , and the modulation sets are known at the receiver, as did in many modulation classification works [10], [11].…”
Section: A Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark: For the time being, we assume that A, σ 2 , and the modulation sets are known at the receiver, as did in many modulation classification works [10], [11].…”
Section: A Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar purely distance-based classifier is proposed in [18]. Since the average distance between constellation points reduces with increasing bandwidth efficiency, this algorithm suffers from an implicit tendency to prefer higher-order modulation schemes.…”
Section: ) Likelihood Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach usually depends on a priori knowledge such as the accurate estimation of the carrier or symbol rate [1,2] . Its result may be invalid once the error of estimation rises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently there are several approaches to this problem. They are the classical decision algorithm based on the likelihood function [1,2] , pattern classification algorithm [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] based on the constellation recovery [4,5] and the character extraction algorithm [6,10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%