2009
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2008.2007916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Definite Programming Algorithms for Sensor Network Node Localization With Uncertainties in Anchor Positions and/or Propagation Speed

Abstract: Abstract-Finding the positions of nodes in an ad hoc wireless sensor network (WSN) with the use of the incomplete and noisy distance measurements between nodes as well as anchor position information is currently an important and challenging research topic. However, most WSN localization studies have considered that the anchor positions and the signal propagation speed are perfectly known which is not a valid assumption in the underwater and underground scenarios. In this paper, semi-definite programming (SDP) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
115
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
115
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings are similar to those of Figure 4. Figure 6 shows the results for the colored noise case and it is seen that the proposed algorithm outperforms [14]. Finally, the first test is repeated with receiver position uncertainty and the MSE performance is plotted in Figure 7.…”
Section: Draft V Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The findings are similar to those of Figure 4. Figure 6 shows the results for the colored noise case and it is seen that the proposed algorithm outperforms [14]. Finally, the first test is repeated with receiver position uncertainty and the MSE performance is plotted in Figure 7.…”
Section: Draft V Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Second, TOA-based localization is addressed and we first compare the proposed scheme with the standard SDR algorithm [14] and CRLB in the uncorrelated noise scenarios. For ease of presentation but without loss of generality, we use…”
Section: Draft V Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first algorithms to focus on improving the computational feasibility of this problem via convex relaxations were based mainly on semi-definite programming (SDP), as in [16][17][18][19][20], and second-order cone programming (SOCP) [21]. Further SDP-based relaxations, e.g., the so-called edge-SDP relaxation, have also been derived to reduce the computational burden [22]. Furthermore, a computationally efficient multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) algorithm [23] and a matrix-completion-based approach [24] have been proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will consider the following 3 scenarios to evaluate the performance of the SDP relaxation method. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 F o r P e e r R e v i e w 13 In this scenario, we fix the number of the anchors and the level of NLOS errors to show the performance of the SDP relaxation method when the measurement noise level is varying. The first 8 anchors listed above are used (i.e., the anchors at the boundary) and the mean of the NLOS error δ i,j is λ = 4 m in (4).…”
Section: A Known Nlos Status and Distribution Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%