2016
DOI: 10.1515/caim-2016-0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian modelling of the atmosphere: a Met Office perspective

Abstract: The semi-Lagrangian numerical method, in conjunction with semi-implicit time integration, provides numerical weather prediction models with numerical stability for large time steps, accurate modes of interest, and good representation of hydrostatic and geostrophic balance. Drawing on the legacy of dynamical cores at the Met Office, the use of the semi-implicit semi-Lagrangian method in an operational numerical weather prediction context is surveyed, together with details of the solution approach and associated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of operational dynamical cores using semi-implicit timeintegrations strategies are the ECMWF 1 's IFS [19], that discretizes the hydrostatic primitive equations, and the UK Met Office's ENDGame [9,50]. In particular, ENDGame uses a double-loop structure in the implicit solver entailing four solves per time step in its operational incarnation, a strategy carried over in recent developments [30], and allowing non-operational configurations to run stably and second-order accurately without additional numerical damping (for operational forecasts, a small amount of off-centering is usually employed for safety reasons).…”
Section: Related Numerical Schemes In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of operational dynamical cores using semi-implicit timeintegrations strategies are the ECMWF 1 's IFS [19], that discretizes the hydrostatic primitive equations, and the UK Met Office's ENDGame [9,50]. In particular, ENDGame uses a double-loop structure in the implicit solver entailing four solves per time step in its operational incarnation, a strategy carried over in recent developments [30], and allowing non-operational configurations to run stably and second-order accurately without additional numerical damping (for operational forecasts, a small amount of off-centering is usually employed for safety reasons).…”
Section: Related Numerical Schemes In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This polynomial-based interpolation no longer preserves wave amplitudes, and instead it dissipates waves in proportion to their wavenumber (relative to the grid scale) and the distance between the interpolated, off-grid point and the nearest on-grid location. For example, bilinear interpolation "semi-implicit," while Benacchio and Wood (2016) suggests the phrase "iterative implicit" for a nonlinear, implicit system solved with a fixed number of iterations.…”
Section: Semi-lagrangian Dissipationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we take the Global Atmosphere 7.0 science configuration of the UM (Walters et al, 2019) and adapt it to Martian conditions. The UM dynamical core (ENDGame, described by Wood et al, 2014) simulates the atmosphere as a non-hydrostatic fully compressible fluid and its numerical formulation uses a semi-implicit timestep and semi-Lagrangian advection scheme (Benacchio and Wood, 2016). A full description of the model's dynamical core is given by Wood (2003, 2008); Wood et al (2014), with a global climate configuration further detailed by Walters et al (2019).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%