This article constitutes the third instalment in a comprehensive series dedicated to the comparative analysis of solvent solutions for oilseeds extraction. With some adaptations, all solvents considered except methanol would allow complete extraction of the meals. Nonpolar solvents such as hexane are penalized by their hydrophobicity in penetrating biological matrices, but their immiscibility with water makes their recycling simple and efficient. Their low energy requirement for evaporation and the use of live steam for final residue elimination are advantageous. Dichloromethane is similar to hexane in its low miscibility with water and high volatility, but its higher density could disrupt percolation by compacting the material bed. Ethyl acetate and 2-methyloxolane have limited miscibility with water, allowing for simple removal of process water, but residual water promotes higher solvent retention in the marc, making the desolventizer’ s task more difficult and requiring higher solvent-to-solid ratios. Saturated methyl ethyl ketone contains even more water, potentially exacerbating these problems. Acetone, as well as ethanol and isopropanol, are completely miscible with water, thus prohibiting the separation of process water and requiring additional process steps such as pervaporation for alcohols and rectification for acetone. Substantial energy savings are possible with these solvents by separating oil from the miscella through cold precipitation, particularly in the case of ethanol, which has low miscibility with oil. An additional operation is the drying applied to the incoming material. Each solvent family therefore presents specific challenges and advantages, requiring tailored solutions to optimize extraction while maintaining efficiency, profitability, and product quality.