2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-021-01451-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-Lagrangian Subgrid Reconstruction for Advection-Dominant Multiscale Problems with Rough Data

Abstract: We introduce a new framework of numerical multiscale methods for advection-dominated problems motivated by climate sciences. Current numerical multiscale methods (MsFEM) work well on stationary elliptic problems but have difficulties when the model involves dominant lower order terms. Our idea to overcome the associated difficulties is a semi-Lagrangian based reconstruction of subgrid variability into a multiscale basis by solving many local inverse problems. Globally the method looks like a Eulerian method wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The essential idea of multi-scale methods is to resolve the fine-scale features such as strong gradients in the layers by locally precomputed generalized FE shape functions. Prime examples are variational multi-scale methods (VMS) [HFMQ98, LM09, JKL06, Må11], multi-scale FEMs [PH04,DLMN15], multi-scale hybrid-mixed methods [HPV15], multiscale discontinuous Galerkin methods [KW14,CL13], multi-scale virtual element methods [XWF21], multi-scale stabilization methods [CCEL16,CEL20], stabilization procedures by means of sub-grid scale [Cod00], energy minimizing generalized multi-scale methods [ZC22], or the multi-scale method for time-dependent convection-dominant problems recently proposed in [SB21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essential idea of multi-scale methods is to resolve the fine-scale features such as strong gradients in the layers by locally precomputed generalized FE shape functions. Prime examples are variational multi-scale methods (VMS) [HFMQ98, LM09, JKL06, Må11], multi-scale FEMs [PH04,DLMN15], multi-scale hybrid-mixed methods [HPV15], multiscale discontinuous Galerkin methods [KW14,CL13], multi-scale virtual element methods [XWF21], multi-scale stabilization methods [CCEL16,CEL20], stabilization procedures by means of sub-grid scale [Cod00], energy minimizing generalized multi-scale methods [ZC22], or the multi-scale method for time-dependent convection-dominant problems recently proposed in [SB21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is common to construct a parameterization using assumptions on grid cell average quantities (Rasch & Kristjánsson, 1998; Sundqvist, 1978; Tiedtke, 1993; M. Zhang et al., 2003), an alternative approach is to first derive a formulation directly from a description of the physical phenomena that enforces the desired physical relationships and constraints, and then choose a numerical method to establish connections between this formulation and the grid cell average quantities the AGCM solves for. For example, both the reconstruct‐evolve‐average (LeVeque, 2002) and semi‐Lagrangian multiscale finite element method (Simon & Behrens, 2019) approaches reconstruct spatial profiles within a grid cell from discrete grid cell average values. Such profiles, referred to as subgrid profiles, can be evolved using equations independent of grid cell size and then be mapped back to discrete grid cell average values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving a parameterization for a given physical process is not a trivial task (McFarlane, 2011). As described by Simon and Behrens (2019), parameterizations derived in a heuristic or intuitive manner can lead to incorrect and unintended physical behaviors. Park et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation