2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-013-1183-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semi-mechanistic Modelling of the Analgesic Effect of Gabapentin in the Formalin-Induced Rat Model of Experimental Pain

Abstract: A compartmental, semi-mechanistic model provides the basis for further understanding of the formalin-induced flinching response and consequently to better characterisation of the properties of gabapentin, such as the potency in individual animals. Moreover, despite high exposure levels, model predictions show that gabapentin does not completely suppress behavioural response in the formalin-induced pain model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no data for cats that describe the optimum plasma drug concentrations for gabapentin. While previously reported data and modeling suggests a half maximal effective concentration (EC50) ranging from 1.4 and 16.7 μg/mL for treatment of hyperalgesia in the rat and 5.4 μg/mL for the treatment of neuropathic pain in man, we cannot determine if these values will apply to cats. Calculation of the average plasma concentration after multiple doses results in a value of 6.11 μg/mL, with median trough concentrations of 2.55 and 1.49 μg/mL for the second‐to‐last and last dose, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…There are no data for cats that describe the optimum plasma drug concentrations for gabapentin. While previously reported data and modeling suggests a half maximal effective concentration (EC50) ranging from 1.4 and 16.7 μg/mL for treatment of hyperalgesia in the rat and 5.4 μg/mL for the treatment of neuropathic pain in man, we cannot determine if these values will apply to cats. Calculation of the average plasma concentration after multiple doses results in a value of 6.11 μg/mL, with median trough concentrations of 2.55 and 1.49 μg/mL for the second‐to‐last and last dose, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…To identify the agonistic effect of 28 in vivo , we investigated the analgesic activity of 28 in formalin-induced inflammatory pain and thermal pain, and the classical anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen (2 mg/kg) was used as a positive control. Formalin-treated mice exhibited persistent pain leading to a biphasic pattern nociceptive response (the acute and inflammatory phases) accompanied by typical repetitive withdrawal behavior. Oral application of 28 showed significant analgesic effects in the two phases and dose-dependently relieved pain behavior in phase II, and 4 mg/kg 28 showed the best analgesic effect on the inflammatory pain induced by formalin (Figure A). Moreover, as shown in Figure B, subcutaneous injection (sc) of 28 (0.02, 0.2, and 2 μg/paw) also resulted in an excellent analgesic effect after administration in comparison with capsaicin (0.2 μg/paw) as a positive control .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analgesic effect in the second phase of the formalin test is predictive of antihyperalgesic activity of our extracts in neuropathic pain models. 11,29,30 It is possible that the mechanism of action of the solvent extracts could be peripherally similar to morphine by blocking substance P or bradykinin known to be involved in nociceptors sensitization or by inhibiting TRPA1 or TRPV1 receptors at the spinal site in phase 1. It could also be centrally by blocking pro-inflammatory pain mediators known to be involved in phase 2 or by inhibiting nociceptive effects of transmitters like glutamate which act as descending facilitators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%